Saviano Sandro, Piermarocchi Rita, Leon Pia E, Mangogna Alessandro, Zanei Andrea, Cavarzeran Sc Fabiano, Tognetto Daniele
University Eye Clinic, University of Trieste, Ospedale Maggiore, Trieste 34129, Italy.
Eye Clinic of Padova, University of Padova, Padova 35128, Italy.
Int J Ophthalmol. 2014 Apr 18;7(2):335-9. doi: 10.3980/j.issn.2222-3959.2014.02.26. eCollection 2014.
To evaluate the efficacy and safety of a combined treatment for myopic choroidal neovascularization (CNV) using photodynamic therapy (PDT) and intravitreal bevacizumab and to compare it with intravitreal bevacizumab monotherapy.
Thirty-four eyes with angiographic evidence of myopic CNV were randomly divided into two groups: 17 were treated with one intravitreal bevacizumab injection (1.25 mg) and low-fluence-rate PDT within seven days of the injection (Group A). The other 17 received monotherapy with bevacizumab injections (Group B). Clinical evidence of complications, best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and fluorescein leakage were evaluated. BCVA and optical coherence tomography (OCT) were evaluated monthly. The timepoints follow-up was established at 6 and 12mo. All patients were retreated following a PRN protocol.
A total of 34 eyes of 34 patients (26 women and 8 men) with a mean age of 62.35 years were included. In Group A (17 eyes) the mean BCVA increased from 0.55±0.13 logMAR before the treatment to 0.40±0.09 logMAR at the 12mo follow-up (P<0.01). In Group B (17 eyes) the mean BCVA increased from 0.60±0.11 logMAR before the treatment to 0.55±0.12 logMAR at the 12mo follow-up (P<0.01). There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups in terms of LogMar visual acuity. In Group A the mean number of combined treatments was 1.8±0.11 per patient; in Group B the mean number of intravitreal bevacizumab injections was 3.1±0.08 per patient. The number of treatments was significantly fewer in Group A (P<0.01). No local or systemic side effects occurred among any of the patients treated in this study.
The combination of anti-angiogenic injections and PDT appears to be a safe and effective option for myopic CNV treatment and allows for a significant reduction of intravitreal injections.
评估光动力疗法(PDT)联合玻璃体内注射贝伐单抗治疗近视性脉络膜新生血管(CNV)的疗效和安全性,并与单纯玻璃体内注射贝伐单抗治疗进行比较。
34例有近视性CNV血管造影证据的患眼被随机分为两组:17例在玻璃体内注射贝伐单抗(1.25mg)后7天内接受低流量率PDT治疗(A组)。另外17例接受贝伐单抗注射单一疗法(B组)。评估并发症的临床证据、最佳矫正视力(BCVA)和荧光素渗漏情况。每月评估BCVA和光学相干断层扫描(OCT)。随访时间点设定为6个月和12个月。所有患者根据按需治疗方案进行再次治疗。
共纳入34例患者的34只眼(26例女性和8例男性),平均年龄62.35岁。A组(17只眼)平均BCVA从治疗前的0.55±0.13 logMAR提高到12个月随访时的0.40±0.09 logMAR(P<0.01)。B组(17只眼)平均BCVA从治疗前的0.60±0.11 logMAR提高到12个月随访时的0.55±0.12 logMAR(P<0.01)。两组在LogMar视力方面无统计学显著差异。A组每位患者联合治疗的平均次数为1.8±0.11次;B组每位患者玻璃体内注射贝伐单抗的平均次数为3.1±0.08次。A组的治疗次数明显更少(P<0.01)。本研究中治疗的任何患者均未出现局部或全身副作用。
抗血管生成注射联合PDT似乎是治疗近视性CNV的一种安全有效的选择,并且可以显著减少玻璃体内注射次数。