Centre for Applied Bioethics, School of Biosciences and School of Veterinary Medicine and Science, University of Nottingham, Sutton Bonington, UK.
ALTEX. 2014;31(2):209-13. doi: 10.14573/altex.1307261.
This paper proposes a framework to support appropriate application of endpoints in animal experiments. It is recommended that unpredicted endpoints should be explicitly considered alongside scientific endpoints and justifiable endpoints as the three types of endpoint which comprise the "humane." We suggest there is a need for clear identification of each type of endpoint and an understanding of the interactions between these types. The use of an "endpoint matrix" during study planning is proposed to promote methodically sound and consistent definition, determination, and detection of unpredicted, scientific, and justifiable endpoints in animal experiments. It is claimed that the further development and use of this tool will support a more effective and harmonized practical application of humane endpoints for all animal use in line with best practice recommendations.
本文提出了一个框架,以支持在动物实验中适当应用终点。建议将意外终点与科学终点和合理终点一起明确考虑为构成“人道”的三种终点类型。我们认为需要明确识别每种终点类型,并了解这些类型之间的相互作用。建议在研究计划中使用“终点矩阵”,以促进在动物实验中系统地、一致地定义、确定和检测意外、科学和合理的终点。据称,进一步开发和使用该工具将支持根据最佳实践建议,更有效地协调一致地应用所有动物使用的人道终点。