Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada; Department of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Psychiatry Res. 2014 Aug 15;218(1-2):61-8. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2014.04.005. Epub 2014 Apr 13.
Despite its debilitating symptoms, the pathophysiology of bipolar disorder (BD) remains unclear. One consistently compelling finding, however, has been the presence of oxidative stress. In the present investigation, we conducted a meta-analysis of studies that measured oxidative stress markers in BD patients compared to healthy controls. Search terms and selection criteria were determined a priori to identify and include all studies that measured a marker of oxidative stress in BD compared to healthy controls. Eight markers were included: superoxide dismutase, catalase, protein carbonyl, glutathione peroxidase, 3-nitrotyrosine, lipid peroxidation, nitric oxide, and DNA/RNA damage. A meta-analysis of standardized means was conducted using a random-effects model with generic inverse weighting. Between-study heterogeneity, publication bias, and sensitivity analyses were also examined for each marker. Twenty-seven papers were included in the meta-analysis, which comprised a total of 971 unique patients with BD and 886 healthy controls. Lipid peroxidation, DNA/RNA damage, and nitric oxide were significantly increased in BD patients compared to healthy controls. Additionally, the effect size for lipid peroxidation was very high. Publication bias was not detected for any of the markers. The main limitations in this meta-analysis are the high degree of heterogeneity between studies and the small number of studies used in the analysis of some markers. Additionally, the sensitivity analysis indicated that some results are not very robust. The results from this meta-analysis support the role of oxidative stress in bipolar disorder, especially to DNA, RNA, and lipids.
尽管双相情感障碍(BD)的症状令人衰弱,但它的病理生理学仍然不清楚。然而,一个始终引人注目的发现是氧化应激的存在。在本研究中,我们对比较 BD 患者和健康对照组的氧化应激标志物的研究进行了荟萃分析。使用预先确定的搜索词和选择标准来识别和纳入所有比较 BD 患者和健康对照组的氧化应激标志物的研究。纳入了 8 个标志物:超氧化物歧化酶、过氧化氢酶、蛋白质羰基、谷胱甘肽过氧化物酶、3-硝基酪氨酸、脂质过氧化、一氧化氮和 DNA/RNA 损伤。使用随机效应模型和通用逆加权对标准化均值进行荟萃分析。还对每个标志物的异质性、发表偏倚和敏感性分析进行了检查。27 篇论文被纳入荟萃分析,共包括 971 名独特的 BD 患者和 886 名健康对照组。与健康对照组相比,BD 患者的脂质过氧化、DNA/RNA 损伤和一氧化氮显著增加。此外,脂质过氧化的效应量非常高。未检测到任何标志物的发表偏倚。本荟萃分析的主要局限性是研究之间存在高度异质性,以及一些标志物分析中使用的研究数量较少。此外,敏感性分析表明,一些结果不是很稳健。这项荟萃分析的结果支持氧化应激在双相情感障碍中的作用,特别是对 DNA、RNA 和脂质。