Pierce Iain T, Keegan Jennifer, Drivas Peter, Gatehouse Peter D, Firmin David N
Cardiovascular BRU, Royal Brompton Hospital, London, UK; National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, UK.
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2015 Apr;41(4):1030-7. doi: 10.1002/jmri.24643. Epub 2014 May 3.
To develop navigator-gated free-breathing 3D spiral late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) imaging of the left ventricle at 3T and compare it with conventional breath-hold 2D Cartesian imaging.
Equivalent slices from 3D spiral and multislice 2D Cartesian acquisitions were compared in 15 subjects in terms of image quality (1, nondiagnostic to 5, excellent), sharpness (1-3), and presence of artifacts (0-2). Blood signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), blood/myocardium contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), and quantitative sharpness were also compared.
All 3D spiral scans were completed faster than an equivalent 2D Cartesian short-axis stack (85 vs. 230 sec, P < 0.001). Image quality was significantly higher for 2D Cartesian images than 3D spiral images (3.7 ± 0.87 vs. 3.4 ± 1.05, P = 0.03) but not for mid or apical slices specifically. There were no significant differences in qualitative and quantitative sharpness (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.91 ± 0.67 vs. 1.93 ± 0.69, P = 0.83 and 95% CI: 0.41 ± 0.07 vs. 0.40 ± 0.09, P = 0.25, respectively), artifact scores (95% CI: 0.16 ± 0.37 vs. 0.40 ± 0.58, P = 0.16), SNR (95% CI: 121.5 ± 55.3 vs. 136.4 ± 77.9, P = 0.13), and CNR (95% CI: 101.6 ± 48.4 vs. 102.7 ± 61.8, P = 0.98). Similar enhancement ratios (0.65 vs. 0.62) and volumes (13.8 vs. 14.1cm(3) ) were measured from scar regions of three patients.
Navigator-gated 3D spiral LGE imaging can be performed in significantly and substantially shorter acquisition durations, although with some reduced image quality, than multiple breath-hold 2D Cartesian imaging while providing higher resolution and contiguous coverage.
开发3T下导航门控自由呼吸三维螺旋延迟钆增强(LGE)左心室成像,并与传统屏气二维笛卡尔成像进行比较。
在15名受试者中比较三维螺旋采集和多层二维笛卡尔采集的等效层面的图像质量(1分,无法诊断至5分,优秀)、锐度(1 - 3分)和伪影情况(0 - 2分)。还比较了血液信噪比(SNR)、血液/心肌对比噪声比(CNR)和定量锐度。
所有三维螺旋扫描完成速度均快于等效的二维笛卡尔短轴堆叠扫描(85秒对230秒,P < 0.001)。二维笛卡尔图像的图像质量显著高于三维螺旋图像(3.7 ± 0.87对3.4 ± 1.05,P = 0.03),但特定的中层或心尖层面图像质量无显著差异。定性和定量锐度(95%置信区间[CI]:1.91 ± 0.67对1.93 ± 0.69,P = 0.83;95%CI:0.41 ± 0.07对0.40 ± 0.09,P = 0.25)、伪影评分(95%CI:0.16 ± 0.37对0.40 ± 0.58,P = 0.16)、SNR(95%CI:121.5 ± 55.3对136.4 ± 77.9,P = 0.13)和CNR(95%CI:101.6 ± 48.4对102.7 ± 61.8,P = 0.98)均无显著差异。从三名患者的瘢痕区域测量得到的增强率(0.65对0.62)和体积(13.8对14.1cm³)相似。
导航门控三维螺旋LGE成像可以在显著更短的采集时间内完成,尽管图像质量有所下降,但与多次屏气二维笛卡尔成像相比,它能提供更高的分辨率和连续覆盖。