Suppr超能文献

聚合酶链反应诊断胸膜结核的准确性

Accuracy of polimerase chain reaction for the diagnosis of pleural tuberculosis.

作者信息

Trajman Anete, da Silva Santos Kleiz de Oliveira Elen Fabricia, Bastos Mayara Lisboa, Belo Neto Epaminondas, Silva Edgar Manoel, da Silva Lourenço Maria Cristina, Kritski Afrânio, Oliveira Martha Maria

机构信息

Graduate Program in Health Education, Gama Filho University, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil; Graduate Program in Internal Medicine, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil; McGill University, Montreal Chest Institute, Montreal, Canada.

Graduate Program in Internal Medicine, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil; Tuberculosis Academic Program - Medical School, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.

出版信息

Respir Med. 2014 Jun;108(6):918-23. doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2014.04.007. Epub 2014 Apr 23.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based techniques to detect Mycobacterium tuberculosis DNA in respiratory specimens have been increasingly used to diagnose pulmonary tuberculosis. Their use in non-respiratory specimens to diagnose extrapulmonary tuberculosis is, however, controversial. In this study, we estimated the accuracy of three in-country commercialized PCR-based diagnostic techniques in pleural fluid samples for the diagnosis of pleural tuberculosis.

METHODS

Patients underwent thoracenthesis for diagnosis purposes; pleural fluid aliquots were frozen and subsequently submitted to two real time PCR tests (COBAS(®)TAQMAN(®)MTB and Xpert(®)MTB/Rif) and one conventional PCR test (Detect-TB(®)). Two different reference standards were considered: probable tuberculosis (based on clinical grounds) and confirmed tuberculosis (bacteriologically or histologically).

RESULTS

Ninety-three patients were included, of whom 65 with pleural tuberculosis, 35 of them confirmed. Sensitivities were 29% for COBAS(®)TAQMAN(®)MTB, 3% for Xpert(®)MTB/Rif and 3% for Detect-TB(®); specificities were 86%, 100% and 97% respectively, considering confirmed tuberculosis. Considering all cases, sensitivities were 16%, 3% and 2%, and specificities, 86%, 100%, and 97%.

DISCUSSION

Compared to the 95% sensitivity of adenosine deaminase, the most sensitive test for pleural tuberculosis, the sensitivities of the three PCR-based tests were very low. We conclude that at present, there is no major place for such tests in routine clinical use.

摘要

引言

基于聚合酶链反应(PCR)的技术用于检测呼吸道标本中的结核分枝杆菌DNA,已越来越多地用于诊断肺结核。然而,其在非呼吸道标本中用于诊断肺外结核存在争议。在本研究中,我们评估了国内三种商业化的基于PCR的诊断技术在胸腔积液样本中诊断结核性胸膜炎的准确性。

方法

患者为明确诊断接受胸腔穿刺术;胸腔积液样本被冷冻,随后进行两项实时PCR检测(COBAS(®)TAQMAN(®)MTB和Xpert(®)MTB/Rif)以及一项传统PCR检测(Detect-TB(®))。考虑了两种不同的参考标准:可能的结核病(基于临床依据)和确诊的结核病(细菌学或组织学确诊)。

结果

纳入93例患者,其中65例患有结核性胸膜炎,35例确诊。以确诊的结核病为参考标准,COBAS(®)TAQMAN(®)MTB的敏感性为29%,Xpert(®)MTB/Rif为3%,Detect-TB(®)为3%;特异性分别为86%、100%和97%。考虑所有病例,敏感性分别为16%、3%和2%,特异性分别为86%、100%和97%。

讨论

与腺苷脱氨酶95%的敏感性相比,腺苷脱氨酶是结核性胸膜炎最敏感的检测方法,三种基于PCR的检测方法的敏感性非常低。我们得出结论,目前,此类检测在常规临床应用中没有重要地位。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验