急诊科就诊患者中白细胞计数、降钙素原和C反应蛋白作为感染或脓毒症诊断及预后生物标志物的比较
Comparison between white blood cell count, procalcitonin and C reactive protein as diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers of infection or sepsis in patients presenting to emergency department.
作者信息
Magrini Laura, Gagliano Giulia, Travaglino Francesco, Vetrone Francesco, Marino Rossella, Cardelli Patrizia, Salerno Gerardo, Di Somma Salvatore
出版信息
Clin Chem Lab Med. 2014 Oct;52(10):1465-72. doi: 10.1515/cclm-2014-0210.
BACKGROUND
Procalcitonin (PCT) is currently the most studied infection biomarker and its blood levels seem to mirror the severity of illness and outcome. PCT is widely used together with other biomarkers, such as white blood cells (WBC) count and C reactive protein (CRP), in order to guide antibiotic therapy. This study aimed to verify the diagnostic and prognostic power of WBC, CRP and PCT in patients with suspected infection in emergency department (ED).
METHODS
A total of 513 patients presenting to the ED with signs/symptoms of local infections or sepsis were enrolled. APACHEII score and in-hospital death were recorded. Patients were subdivided into quartiles by age, and the biomarkers were measured at baseline. Receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curves for evaluating diagnostic and prognostic role of PCT, CRP and WBC were calculated for each variable alone and combined.
RESULTS
When compared each other for PCT, CRP, and WBC there was no significant difference between the four subgroups. A direct correlation between PCT and WBC was found in the II, III, and IV quartiles (the highest correlation, r=0.34, p<0.0003). PCT alone or when combined with WBC showed the best diagnostic and prognostic power at ROC analysis.
CONCLUSIONS
Our data demonstrate that WBC, but more CRP and PCT are reliable diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers, when considered in combination and with severity clinical score. PCT confirms its stronger usefulness as a diagnostic marker of sepsis. A multi-diagnostic tools approach is fundamental to perform a correct and rapid diagnosis of infection and sepsis in ED.
背景
降钙素原(PCT)是目前研究最多的感染生物标志物,其血液水平似乎反映了疾病的严重程度和预后。PCT与其他生物标志物(如白细胞(WBC)计数和C反应蛋白(CRP))一起被广泛用于指导抗生素治疗。本研究旨在验证白细胞、CRP和PCT在急诊科(ED)疑似感染患者中的诊断和预后价值。
方法
共纳入513例因局部感染或脓毒症的体征/症状就诊于急诊科的患者。记录急性生理学与慢性健康状况评分系统II(APACHEII)评分和住院死亡率。根据年龄将患者分为四分位数,并在基线时测量生物标志物。计算每个变量单独及联合时评估PCT、CRP和WBC诊断和预后作用的受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线。
结果
比较PCT、CRP和WBC时,四个亚组之间无显著差异。在第二、第三和第四四分位数中发现PCT与WBC之间存在直接相关性(最高相关性,r = 0.34,p < 0.0003)。在ROC分析中,单独的PCT或与WBC联合时显示出最佳的诊断和预后价值。
结论
我们的数据表明,当结合临床严重程度评分考虑时,白细胞、尤其是CRP和PCT是可靠的诊断和预后生物标志物。PCT证实了其作为脓毒症诊断标志物的更强效用。采用多种诊断工具的方法对于在急诊科正确、快速地诊断感染和脓毒症至关重要。