Farmer Adam D, Mohammed Sahar D, Dukes George E, Scott S Mark, Hobson Anthony R
Adam D Farmer, Sahar D Mohammed, S Mark Scott, Centre for Digestive Diseases, Blizard Institute of Cell and Molecular Science, Wingate Institute of Neurogastroenterology, Barts and the London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London E1 2AJ, United Kingdom.
World J Gastroenterol. 2014 May 7;20(17):5000-7. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i17.5000.
To ascertain whether caecal pH is different in patients with irritable bowel syndrome (IBS), whose primary symptoms are bloating and distension, to healthy controls.
Motility and pH data were reviewed from 16 patients with Rome III defined IBS and 16 healthy controls, who had undergone a wireless motility capsule (WMC) study using a standardized protocol. Motility measures were anchored around known anatomical landmarks as identified by compartmental pH changes. Sixty-minute epochs were used to quantify antral, duodenal, ileal, caecal and distal colonic contractility. The maximum and minimum pH was measured either side of the ileo-caecal junction.
No differences were seen in motility parameters, compartmental transit times or maximal ileal pH between the two groups. Caecal pH was significantly lower in patients compared to controls (5.12 ± 0.05 vs 6.16 ± 0.15, P < 0.0001). The ileal:caecal Δchange was greater in patients than controls (-2.63 ± 0.08 vs -1.42 ± 0.11, P < 0.0001). There was a significant correlation between caecal pH and right colonic contractility (r = 0.54, P = 0.002).
Patients with bloating and distension have a lower caecal pH compared to controls. The measurement of caecal pH using the WMC provides a quantifiable biomarker of fermentation potentially identifying those patients that may preferentially benefit from antibiotic or dietary interventions.
确定以腹胀为主要症状的肠易激综合征(IBS)患者的盲肠pH值与健康对照者是否存在差异。
回顾了16例符合罗马III标准的IBS患者和16例健康对照者的动力和pH值数据,这些患者和对照者均按照标准化方案接受了无线动力胶囊(WMC)研究。动力测量以通过分区pH值变化确定的已知解剖标志为锚点。采用60分钟时段来量化胃窦、十二指肠、回肠、盲肠和结肠远端的收缩性。在回盲交界处两侧测量最大和最小pH值。
两组之间在动力参数、分区转运时间或回肠最大pH值方面均未观察到差异。与对照组相比,患者的盲肠pH值显著更低(5.12±0.05对6.16±0.15,P<0.0001)。患者的回肠:盲肠Δ变化大于对照组(-2.63±0.08对-1.42±0.11,P<0.0001)。盲肠pH值与右半结肠收缩性之间存在显著相关性(r=0.54,P=0.002)。
与对照组相比,有腹胀症状的患者盲肠pH值更低。使用WMC测量盲肠pH值可提供一种可量化的发酵生物标志物,有可能识别出那些可能优先从抗生素或饮食干预中获益的患者。