Adams Mark R, Scolaro John A, Routt Milton Lee Chip
Department of Orthopaedics, Rutgers, New Jersey Medical School, 140 Bergen Street, D level, Newark, NJ, 07103, USA,
J Orthop Traumatol. 2014 Sep;15(3):195-9. doi: 10.1007/s10195-014-0296-9. Epub 2014 May 8.
Open reduction and plate fixation of the disrupted symphysis pubis is commonly performed through a horizontal Pfannenstiel incision. Certain clinical situations that complicate the soft tissue conditions of the lower abdomen may make the Pfannenstiel incision a less appealing option. We report on the use of a vertical pubic area midline skin incision in a series of patients undergoing open reduction and plate fixation of their traumatically disrupted symphysis pubis.
Institutional Review Board approval was obtained for a retrospective chart review of the charts of 25 patients treated between September 2011 and October 2012. Their charts were reviewed for patient age, gender, body mass index (BMI), pelvic injury type (as classified by Young and Burgess), mechanism of injury and associated traumatic injuries. The depth of the approach was estimated using the pelvic computed tomography (CT) scan. Details from the operative procedure were recorded, as was the length of follow-up and any perioperative complications.
Twenty-five patients were eligible for inclusion during the defined study time period between September 2011 and October 2012. The patients' average age was 55.8 years (range 25-91). All patients were males. The average BMI was 29.3 (range 18.8-43.8). The depth measured on the axial pelvic CT scan from skin to symphysis was 57.6 mm (range 35.2-90.2 mm). Five of 25 patients had an isolated pelvic ring injury without other associated injuries. The injury pattern was APC2 in 18, APC3 in 3, LC2 in 2, LC3 in 1 and VS in 1 patient(s) [anterior posterior compression (APC), lateral compression (LC), vertical shear (VS)]. Urologic procedures were performed in the same surgical setting in four patients. The average blood loss was 244 ml (range 150-400 ml). The average follow-up was 2.5 months (range 1-12 months). Perioperative issues were noted in two patients. One patient died within a month of surgery as a result of his associated traumatic injuries. One patient developed a deep infection.
The pubic midline skin exposure is a feasible alternative to the Pfannenstiel incision for open reduction and plate fixation of the pubic symphysis.
IV, Retrospective case series.
耻骨联合分离的切开复位钢板固定术通常通过耻骨上横切口(Pfannenstiel切口)进行。某些使下腹部软组织情况复杂化的临床状况可能使Pfannenstiel切口成为不太有吸引力的选择。我们报告在一系列因创伤性耻骨联合分离而接受切开复位钢板固定术的患者中使用耻骨区垂直中线皮肤切口的情况。
本研究获得机构审查委员会批准,对2011年9月至2012年10月期间接受治疗的25例患者的病历进行回顾性分析。查阅他们的病历以了解患者的年龄、性别、体重指数(BMI)、骨盆损伤类型(根据Young和Burgess分类)、损伤机制及相关创伤性损伤。使用骨盆计算机断层扫描(CT)扫描估计手术入路的深度。记录手术过程的详细情况以及随访时间和任何围手术期并发症。
在2011年9月至2012年10月规定的研究时间段内,25例患者符合纳入标准。患者的平均年龄为55.8岁(范围25 - 91岁)。所有患者均为男性。平均BMI为29.3(范围18.8 - 43.8)。在轴向骨盆CT扫描上测量的从皮肤到耻骨联合的深度为57.6 mm(范围35.2 - 90.2 mm)。25例患者中有5例为单纯骨盆环损伤,无其他相关损伤。损伤类型为18例APC2型、3例APC3型、2例LC2型、1例LC3型和1例VS型[前后挤压(APC)、侧方挤压(LC)、垂直剪切(VS)]。4例患者在同一手术环境中进行了泌尿外科手术。平均失血量为244 ml(范围150 - 400 ml)。平均随访时间为2.5个月(范围1 - 12个月)。2例患者出现围手术期问题。1例患者在术后1个月内因相关创伤性损伤死亡。1例患者发生深部感染。
耻骨中线皮肤暴露是耻骨联合切开复位钢板固定术替代Pfannenstiel切口的一种可行选择。
IV,回顾性病例系列。