De Servi Stefano, Goedicke Jochen, Schirmer Andreas, Widimsky Petr
Coronary Care Unit, IRCCS Policlinico S.Matteo, Pavia, Italy
Lilly Deutschland GmbH, Germany.
Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care. 2014 Dec;3(4):363-72. doi: 10.1177/2048872614534078. Epub 2014 May 12.
In the TRial to assess Improvement in Therapeutic Outcomes by optimizing platelet inhibitioN with prasugrel Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction 38 (TRITON-TIMI 38), prasugrel reduced the primary ischaemic endpoint as compared with clopidogrel in acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patients planned to undergo percutaneous coronary interventions, but increased the risk of bleeding. The present analysis shows the efficacy and safety data for the 10,074 non-ST segment elevation (NSTE)-ACS patients included in that trial.
The primary endpoint was significantly reduced by prasugrel in the overall NSTE-ACS population (hazard ratio (HR) 0.82, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.73-0.93, p=0.002) as well as in unstable angina (UA) and in non-ST elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) patient subgroups (interaction p value=0.39). Although non-coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) TIMI major bleeding was increased with prasugrel as compared with clopidogrel (HR 1.40, 95% CI 1.05-1.88, p=0.02), there was a net clinical benefit in patients assigned to prasugrel (HR 0.89, 95% CI 0.80-1.00, p=0.043), which was consistent for UA and NSTEMI subgroups (interaction p value=0.84 and 0.72). In patients who met the criteria for prasugrel use recommended by the European Medicines Agency, thus excluding from the analysis patients with prior transient ischemic attack (TIA)/stroke, with weight <60 kg or age ≥75 years, and censoring follow-up at 365 days, (European Union (EU)-label cohort) prasugrel showed superiority over clopidogrel with regard to the primary endpoint (HR 0.73, 95% CI 0.63-0.85, p<0.0001) for the entire NSTE-ACS population, as well as for UA patients and NSTEMI patients without significant differences in non-CABG TIMI major bleeding.
Prasugrel, as compared with clopidogrel, significantly reduced the primary endpoint of the TRITON-TIMI 38 trial in NSTE-ACS patients, as well as in the UA and NSTEMI groups. A significant reduction in the primary endpoint without increased bleeding was observed in the EU-label cohort.
在心肌梗死溶栓治疗38(TRITON-TIMI 38)试验中,旨在通过优化普拉格雷的血小板抑制作用来评估治疗结果的改善情况,在计划接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的急性冠状动脉综合征(ACS)患者中,与氯吡格雷相比,普拉格雷降低了主要缺血终点,但增加了出血风险。本分析展示了该试验中纳入的10,074例非ST段抬高(NSTE)-ACS患者的疗效和安全性数据。
在总体NSTE-ACS人群中,普拉格雷显著降低了主要终点(风险比(HR)0.82,95%置信区间(CI)0.73 - 0.93,p = 0.002),在不稳定型心绞痛(UA)和非ST段抬高型心肌梗死(NSTEMI)患者亚组中也是如此(交互p值 = 0.39)。尽管与氯吡格雷相比,普拉格雷使非冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG)TIMI大出血发生率增加(HR 1.40,95% CI 1.05 - 1.88,p = 0.02),但分配到普拉格雷组的患者有净临床获益(HR 0.89,95% CI 0.80 - 1.00,p = 0.043),这在UA和NSTEMI亚组中是一致的(交互p值分别为0.84和0.72)。在符合欧洲药品管理局推荐的普拉格雷使用标准的患者中,即排除既往有短暂性脑缺血发作(TIA)/中风、体重<60 kg或年龄≥75岁的患者,并在365天进行随访截尾(欧盟(EU)标签队列),普拉格雷在整个NSTE-ACS人群的主要终点方面显示出优于氯吡格雷(HR 0.73,95% CI 0.63 - 0.85,p < 0.0001),在UA患者和NSTEMI患者中也是如此,且非CABG TIMI大出血无显著差异。
与氯吡格雷相比,普拉格雷显著降低了TRITON-TIMI 38试验中NSTE-ACS患者以及UA和NSTEMI组的主要终点。在欧盟标签队列中观察到主要终点显著降低且出血未增加。