McCarthy Michael A, Moore Alana L, Krauss Jochen, Morgan John W, Clements Christopher F
School of Botany, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria 3010, Australia.
Conserv Biol. 2014 Dec;28(6):1575-83. doi: 10.1111/cobi.12308. Epub 2014 May 12.
Biodiversity indices often combine data from different species when used in monitoring programs. Heuristic properties can suggest preferred indices, but we lack objective ways to discriminate between indices with similar heuristics. Biodiversity indices can be evaluated by determining how well they reflect management objectives that a monitoring program aims to support. For example, the Convention on Biological Diversity requires reporting about extinction rates, so simple indices that reflect extinction risk would be valuable. We developed 3 biodiversity indices that are based on simple models of population viability that relate extinction risk to abundance. We based the first index on the geometric mean abundance of species and the second on a more general power mean. In a third index, we integrated the geometric mean abundance and trend. These indices require the same data as previous indices, but they also relate directly to extinction risk. Field data for butterflies and woodland plants and experimental studies of protozoan communities show that the indices correlate with local extinction rates. Applying the index based on the geometric mean to global data on changes in avian abundance suggested that the average extinction probability of birds has increased approximately 1% from 1970 to 2009.
生物多样性指数在监测项目中使用时,常常会整合来自不同物种的数据。启发式属性可以提示首选指数,但我们缺乏客观的方法来区分具有相似启发式的指数。生物多样性指数可以通过确定它们在多大程度上反映监测项目旨在支持的管理目标来进行评估。例如,《生物多样性公约》要求报告灭绝率,因此反映灭绝风险的简单指数将很有价值。我们基于将灭绝风险与丰度相关联的种群生存力简单模型开发了3种生物多样性指数。第一个指数基于物种的几何平均丰度,第二个基于更一般的幂平均。在第三个指数中,我们整合了几何平均丰度和趋势。这些指数需要与以前的指数相同的数据,但它们也直接与灭绝风险相关。蝴蝶和林地植物的实地数据以及原生动物群落的实验研究表明,这些指数与当地灭绝率相关。将基于几何平均的指数应用于鸟类丰度变化的全球数据表明,从1970年到2009年,鸟类的平均灭绝概率增加了约1%。