Hoste J, Daci E, Mathieu C
Acta Clin Belg. 2014 Jun;69(3):171-6. doi: 10.1179/2295333714Y.0000000018. Epub 2014 Mar 20.
To assess the efficacy and safety of vildagliptin versus other oral glucose-lowering drugs added to antidiabetic monotherapy in Belgian patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus, in comparison to the global EDGE study results.
This is a pre-specified post-hoc subanalysis of the Belgian patient cohort from a worldwide 1-year observational study that compared the effectiveness and tolerability of vildagliptin to other oral antidiabetic agents in type 2 diabetes patients failing monotherapy with oral glucose-lowering agents (EDGE). A total of 1793 Belgian patients were enrolled. Physicians could add any oral antidiabetic drug and patients entered either into the vildagliptin or the comparator cohort. The primary effectiveness and tolerability endpoint was defined as the proportion of patients having a treatment response (HbA1c reduction from baseline to month 12 endpoint >0·3%) without hypoglycemia, weight gain, peripheral oedema, or gastrointestinal side-effects.
In the Belgian population, 37·8% of patients in the vildagliptin group and 32·8% in the comparator group had a decrease in HbA1c of >0·3% without the predefined tolerability issues of hypoglycemia, weight gain, oedema or, gastrointestinal complaints (primary endpoint), resulting in an unadjusted odds ratio of 1·24 (95% CI: 0·96-1·61). Mean HbA1c change from baseline was -0·81% in the vildagliptin cohort and -0·75% in the comparator cohort. Overall, vildagliptin was well tolerated with similarly low incidences of total adverse events (14·9% versus 14·5% in the compactor group) and serious adverse events (2·7% versus 2·5% in the comparator group).
In this EDGE subgroup of Belgian patients with type 2 diabetes who do not achieve the glycemic targets with monotherapy, a similar trend as in the global EDGE study was observed. Adding vildagliptin as a second oral glucose-lowering agent resulted in lowering HbA1c to <7% without weight gain, hypoglycemia or peripheral oedema in a higher proportion of patients than comparator oral antidiabetic drugs, with no differences in the reported number of adverse events.
与全球EDGE研究结果相比较,评估在比利时2型糖尿病患者中,维格列汀与添加到抗糖尿病单药治疗中的其他口服降糖药物相比的疗效和安全性。
这是一项针对比利时患者队列的预先指定的事后亚组分析,该队列来自一项为期1年的全球观察性研究,该研究比较了维格列汀与其他口服抗糖尿病药物在口服降糖药单药治疗失败的2型糖尿病患者中的有效性和耐受性(EDGE)。共纳入1793例比利时患者。医生可以添加任何口服抗糖尿病药物,患者被纳入维格列汀组或对照组。主要有效性和耐受性终点定义为有治疗反应(糖化血红蛋白从基线降至第12个月末终点>0.3%)且无低血糖、体重增加、外周水肿或胃肠道副作用的患者比例。
在比利时人群中,维格列汀组37.8%的患者和对照组32.8%的患者糖化血红蛋白降低>0.3%,且无预先定义的低血糖、体重增加、水肿或胃肠道不适等耐受性问题(主要终点),未调整的优势比为1.24(95%CI:0.96-1.61)。维格列汀队列中糖化血红蛋白从基线的平均变化为-0.81%,对照组为-0.75%。总体而言,维格列汀耐受性良好,总不良事件发生率(14.9%对对照组的14.5%)和严重不良事件发生率(2.7%对对照组的2.5%)同样较低。
在这个未通过单药治疗达到血糖目标的比利时2型糖尿病患者的EDGE亚组中,观察到了与全球EDGE研究相似的趋势。添加维格列汀作为第二种口服降糖药,与对照口服抗糖尿病药物相比,更多患者的糖化血红蛋白降至<7%,且无体重增加、低血糖或外周水肿,报告的不良事件数量无差异。