Suppr超能文献

急诊科医疗相关性肺炎患者不同初始抗菌治疗的临床疗效分析

Analysis of clinical efficacy of different initial antimicrobial treatment in healthcare associated pneumonia patients in emergency department.

作者信息

Cao Guohui, Chen Xuyan, Wu Sheng

机构信息

Department of Emergency Medicine, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing 100034, China.

Department of Emergency Medicine, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing 100034, China. Email:

出版信息

Chin Med J (Engl). 2014;127(10):1814-9.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Community acquired pneumonia (CAP) is one of the most common infectious disease in emergency department. In 2005 the concept of healthcare associated pneumonia (HCAP) was proposed by the ATS/IDSA guidelines. The clinical features and microbiology of HCAP are different from CAP, however, the initial antimicrobial treatment is still controversial. We aimed to compare the clinical efficacy between HCAP patients treated initially with HCAP guideline-concordant antimicrobial agents and those with CAP guideline-concordant antimicrobial agents.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective observational study on HCAP patients who were admitted to emergency department between December 2011 and December 2012. Patients were divided into 2 groups according to their different initial antimicrobial treatment. We compared clinical features, distribution of pathogen, severity, days and spending on intravenous antimicrobial, length and charge of hospitalization and clinical outcomes, and meanwhile analyzed the clinical efficacy as well.

RESULTS

Of the 125 HCAP patients, 55 patients received CAP guideline-concordant antimicrobial agents and 70 received HCAP agents. The major pathogens were Klebsiella pneumoniae, methicillin-resistant staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Escherichia coli. The 2 groups were similar at baseline, including old age, comorbidities, Pneumonia Severity Index scores, APACHE scores, and length of intravenous antimicrobial use and hospitalization duration, and in-hospital mortality. Overall efficacy rate occurred in 70.0% of HCAP agent patients and 50.9% of CAP agent patients (P = 0.029). Antimicrobial charge and total hospital charge for HCAP agent patients were significantly higher than that for CAP agent patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Initial treatment of HCAP patients in emergency department with HCAP guideline-concordant antimicrobial could increase clinical efficacy rate, as well as antimicrobial charge and total hospital charge, but was not associated with shortening the length of stay, or lowering in-hospital mortality.

摘要

背景

社区获得性肺炎(CAP)是急诊科最常见的传染病之一。2005年,美国胸科学会(ATS)/美国感染病学会(IDSA)指南提出了医疗保健相关肺炎(HCAP)的概念。HCAP的临床特征和微生物学与CAP不同,然而,初始抗菌治疗仍存在争议。我们旨在比较初始使用符合HCAP指南的抗菌药物治疗的HCAP患者与使用符合CAP指南的抗菌药物治疗的患者之间的临床疗效。

方法

我们对2011年12月至2012年12月期间入住急诊科的HCAP患者进行了一项回顾性观察研究。根据患者不同的初始抗菌治疗将其分为两组。我们比较了临床特征、病原体分布、严重程度、静脉使用抗菌药物的天数和费用、住院时间和费用以及临床结局,同时也分析了临床疗效。

结果

在125例HCAP患者中,55例接受了符合CAP指南的抗菌药物治疗,70例接受了符合HCAP指南的抗菌药物治疗。主要病原体为肺炎克雷伯菌、耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌(MRSA)、铜绿假单胞菌和大肠杆菌。两组在基线时相似,包括年龄、合并症、肺炎严重程度指数评分、急性生理与慢性健康状况评分系统(APACHE)评分、静脉使用抗菌药物的时间和住院时间以及院内死亡率。符合HCAP指南的抗菌药物治疗组患者的总有效率为70.0%,符合CAP指南的抗菌药物治疗组患者为50.9%(P = 0.029)。符合HCAP指南的抗菌药物治疗组患者的抗菌药物费用和总住院费用显著高于符合CAP指南的抗菌药物治疗组患者。

结论

急诊科HCAP患者初始使用符合HCAP指南的抗菌药物治疗可提高临床有效率,同时增加抗菌药物费用和总住院费用,但与缩短住院时间或降低院内死亡率无关。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验