Marulli Giuseppe, Verderi Enrico, Zuin Andrea, Schiavon Marco, Battistella Lucia, Perissinotto Egle, Romanello Paola, Favaretto Adolfo Gino, Pasello Giulia, Rea Federico
Department of Cardiologic, Thoracic and Vascular Sciences, Division of Thoracic Surgery, University of Padova, Padova, Italy
Department of Cardiologic, Thoracic and Vascular Sciences, Division of Thoracic Surgery, University of Padova, Padova, Italy.
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2014 Aug;19(2):256-62; discussion 262. doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivu141. Epub 2014 May 13.
Induction therapy (IT) has gained popularity in recent years, becoming a standard of treatment in resectable lymph node-positive NSCLC. IT aims to downstage the disease (shrinkage of tumour and clearance of lymph node-metastases), clear distant micrometastases and prolong survival. Potential disadvantages are increased morbidity and/or mortality after surgery and risk of progression of disease that could have been initially resected. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the outcomes and prognostic factors in a series of patients with lymph node-positive NSCLC receiving IT followed by surgery.
A total of 86 patients (75.6% males, median age 63 years) affected by NSCLC in clinical stage IIIA (n = 80) or IIIB (n = 6), with pathologically proven lymph node involvement, underwent platinum-based IT followed by surgery between 2000 and 2009.
Eighty (93%) patients received a median of 3 cycles of chemotherapy, and 6 (7%) underwent induction chemoradiotherapy. Response to IT was complete in 3.5%, partial in 59.3% and stable disease in 37.2% of patients. Postoperative morbidity and mortality were 25.6 and 2.3%, respectively. At pathological evaluation, 38.4% of patients had a downstaging of disease with a complete lymph node clearance in 31.4%. Median overall survival was 23 months (5-year survival 33%). Univariate analysis found clinical stage (P = 0.02), histology (P = 0.01), response to IT (P = 0.02) and type of intervention (P = 0.047) to have predictive roles in survival. A better but not significant survival was also found for pN0 vs pN+ (P = 0.22), downstaged tumours (P = 0.08) and left side (P = 0.06). On multivariate analysis, clinical response to neoadjuvant therapy (P = 0.01) and age (P = 0.03) were the only independent predictors of survival.
The use of IT for lymph node-positive NSCLC seems justified by low morbidity and/or mortality and good survival rates. Patients with response to IT showed greater benefit in the long term.
诱导治疗(IT)近年来越来越受欢迎,已成为可切除的淋巴结阳性非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)的治疗标准。诱导治疗旨在降低疾病分期(肿瘤缩小和清除淋巴结转移灶)、清除远处微转移灶并延长生存期。潜在的缺点是术后发病率和/或死亡率增加,以及原本可切除的疾病进展风险。本研究的目的是评估一系列接受诱导治疗后再行手术的淋巴结阳性NSCLC患者的治疗结果和预后因素。
共有86例患者(男性占75.6%,中位年龄63岁),临床分期为IIIA期(n = 80)或IIIB期(n = 6),经病理证实有淋巴结受累,于2000年至2009年间接受了以铂类为基础的诱导治疗,随后进行手术。
80例(93%)患者接受了中位3个周期的化疗,6例(7%)接受了诱导放化疗。诱导治疗的反应为:3.5%的患者完全缓解,59.3%的患者部分缓解,37.2%的患者病情稳定。术后发病率和死亡率分别为25.6%和2.3%。病理评估显示,38.4%的患者疾病分期降低,31.4%的患者淋巴结完全清除。中位总生存期为23个月(5年生存率为33%)。单因素分析发现临床分期(P = 0.02)、组织学类型(P = 0.01)、对诱导治疗的反应(P = 0.02)和干预类型(P = 0.047)对生存有预测作用。pN0与pN+相比(P = 0.22)、分期降低的肿瘤(P = 0.08)和左侧肿瘤(P = 0.06)的生存率也较好,但差异无统计学意义。多因素分析显示,新辅助治疗的临床反应(P = 0.01)和年龄(P = 0.03)是生存的唯一独立预测因素。
对于淋巴结阳性NSCLC患者,使用诱导治疗似乎是合理的,因为其发病率和/或死亡率较低,生存率良好。对诱导治疗有反应的患者长期获益更大。