Ilboudo Patrick G C, Greco Giulia, Sundby Johanne, Torsvik Gaute
Département de Santé Publique, Unité de Recherche sur les Politiques et Systèmes de Santé, Centre Muraz, 2054 Avenue Mamadou Konaté, 01 BP 390 Bobo-Dioulasso, Burkina Faso Agence de Formation, de Recherche et d'Expertise en Santé pour l'Afrique (AFRICSanté), 773 Rue Guillaume Ouédraogo 01 BP 298 Bobo-Dioulasso, Burkina Faso Department of Community Medicine, University of Oslo, Post Box 1130 Blindern, 0317 Oslo, Norway Health Economics and Systems Analysis Group, Department of Global Health and Development, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine 15-17 Tavistock Place, London, WC1H 9SH, United Kingdom University of Bergen and Chr Michelsen Institute, P.O.Box 6033 Bedriftssenteret, N-5892 Bergen, Norway Département de Santé Publique, Unité de Recherche sur les Politiques et Systèmes de Santé, Centre Muraz, 2054 Avenue Mamadou Konaté, 01 BP 390 Bobo-Dioulasso, Burkina Faso Agence de Formation, de Recherche et d'Expertise en Santé pour l'Afrique (AFRICSanté), 773 Rue Guillaume Ouédraogo 01 BP 298 Bobo-Dioulasso, Burkina Faso Department of Community Medicine, University of Oslo, Post Box 1130 Blindern, 0317 Oslo, Norway Health Economics and Systems Analysis Group, Department of Global Health and Development, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine 15-17 Tavistock Place, London, WC1H 9SH, United Kingdom University of Bergen and Chr Michelsen Institute, P.O.Box 6033 Bedriftssenteret, N-5892 Bergen, Norway Département de Santé Publique, Unité de Recherche sur les Politiques et Systèmes de Santé, Centre Muraz, 2054 Avenue Mamadou Konaté, 01 BP 390 Bobo-Dioulasso, Burkina Faso Agence de Formation, de Recherche et d'Expertise en Santé pour l'Afrique (AFRICSanté), 773 Rue Guillaume Ouédraogo 01 BP 298 Bobo-Dioulasso, Burkina Faso Department of Community Medicine, University of Oslo, Post Box 1130 Blindern, 0317 Oslo, Norway Health Economics and Systems Analysis Group, Department of Global Health and Development, London School of Hygiene
Département de Santé Publique, Unité de Recherche sur les Politiques et Systèmes de Santé, Centre Muraz, 2054 Avenue Mamadou Konaté, 01 BP 390 Bobo-Dioulasso, Burkina Faso Agence de Formation, de Recherche et d'Expertise en Santé pour l'Afrique (AFRICSanté), 773 Rue Guillaume Ouédraogo 01 BP 298 Bobo-Dioulasso, Burkina Faso Department of Community Medicine, University of Oslo, Post Box 1130 Blindern, 0317 Oslo, Norway Health Economics and Systems Analysis Group, Department of Global Health and Development, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine 15-17 Tavistock Place, London, WC1H 9SH, United Kingdom University of Bergen and Chr Michelsen Institute, P.O.Box 6033 Bedriftssenteret, N-5892 Bergen, Norway.
Health Policy Plan. 2015 May;30(4):500-7. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czu025. Epub 2014 May 14.
Little is known about the costs and consequences of abortions to women and their households. Our aim was to study both costs and consequences of induced and spontaneous abortions and complications. We carried out a cross-sectional study between February and September 2012 in Ouagadougou, the capital city of Burkina Faso. Quantitative data of 305 women whose pregnancy ended with either an induced or a spontaneous abortion were prospectively collected on sociodemographic, asset ownership, medical and health expenditures including pre-referral costs following the patient's perspective. Descriptive analysis and regression analysis of costs were performed. We found that women with induced abortion were often single or never married, younger, more educated and had earlier pregnancies than women with spontaneous abortion. They also tended to be more often under parents' guardianship compared with women with spontaneous abortion. Women with induced abortion paid much more money to obtain abortion and treatment of the resulting complications compared with women with spontaneous abortion: US$89 (44 252 CFA ie franc of the African Financial Community) vs US$56 (27 668 CFA). The results also suggested that payments associated with induced abortion were catastrophic as they consumed 15% of the gross domestic product per capita. Additionally, 11-16% of total households appeared to have resorted to coping strategies in order to face costs. Both induced and spontaneous abortions may incur high expenses with short-term economic repercussions on households' poverty. Actions are needed in order to reduce the financial burden of abortion costs and promote an effective use of contraceptives.
关于堕胎对女性及其家庭造成的成本和后果,人们知之甚少。我们的目的是研究人工流产和自然流产及其并发症的成本和后果。2012年2月至9月,我们在布基纳法索首都瓦加杜古开展了一项横断面研究。前瞻性收集了305名妊娠以人工流产或自然流产告终的女性的社会人口统计学、资产拥有情况、医疗和卫生支出(包括从患者角度出发的转诊前费用)的定量数据。对成本进行了描述性分析和回归分析。我们发现,与自然流产的女性相比,人工流产的女性往往单身或从未结婚、更年轻、受教育程度更高且怀孕时间更早。与自然流产的女性相比,她们也更常处于父母的监护之下。与自然流产的女性相比,人工流产的女性为获得流产及治疗由此产生的并发症支付了更多的钱:89美元(44252非洲金融共同体法郎)对56美元(27668非洲金融共同体法郎)。结果还表明,与人工流产相关的支出具有灾难性,因为它们消耗了人均国内生产总值的15%。此外,11%至16%的家庭似乎为了应对费用而采取了应对策略。人工流产和自然流产都可能产生高昂费用,对家庭贫困造成短期经济影响。需要采取行动以减轻堕胎成本的经济负担,并促进有效使用避孕药具。