Itch is defined as “an unpleasant cutaneous sensation which provokes the desire to scratch” (Rothman 1941, p. 357) and differs from pain sensation, defined as an “unpleasant sensory and emotional experience associated with actual or potential tissue damage” (IASP Taxonomy). Nevertheless, the neuronal mechanisms that distinguish itch from pain are not fully understood. There is a long-standing debate between labeled-line versus and population-coding theories of itch (Ma 2010). The concept of labeled-line coding holds that itch-specific primary afferents or “pruriceptors” transmit information to central ascending sensory neurons that are dedicated to signaling itch sensation. In contrast, population-coding mechanisms are based on the assumption that itch is signaled by a subpopulation of neurons that may receive both pruriceptive and nociceptive input. The thermosensitive transient receptor potential (TRP) channels TRPV1 and TRPA1, which bind capsaicin and allyl isothiocyanate (mustard oil), respectively, are important for pain transmission. Interestingly, knockout mice lacking TRPV1 or TRPA1 exhibit less histamine- or chloroquine-evoked scratching behavior, respectively (Imamachi et al. 2009; Shim et al. 2007; Wilson et al. 2011), suggesting that pruriceptors express TRPV1 or TRPA1 that are presumably downstream of the immediate itch transduction process. Moreover, these findings imply that both pruriceptors and nociceptors express these algogen-sensitive TRP channels. Consistent with this, electrophysiology studies revealed that most pruritogen-responsive neurons in the spinal cord dorsal horn also respond to algogens in mice (Akiyama et al. 2009a, 2012b), rats (Jinks and Carstens 2002), and monkeys (Davidson et al. 2007, 2012; Simone et al. 2004). It was hypothesized that itch is signaled by the subpopulation of pruritogen- and algogen-sensitive neurons, while pain is signaled by the subpopulation of neurons responsive to algogens but not pruritogens (Akiyama et al. 2010c; Davidson et al. 2012). This chapter will discuss spinal coding of itch and pain as well as modulation of itch by noxious counterstimuli.
瘙痒被定义为“一种引起搔抓欲望的令人不适的皮肤感觉”(罗斯曼,1941年,第357页),它与疼痛感觉不同,疼痛被定义为“一种与实际的或潜在的组织损伤相关的令人不适的感觉和情感体验”(国际疼痛研究协会分类法)。然而,区分瘙痒与疼痛的神经机制尚未完全明确。关于瘙痒的标记线编码理论与群体编码理论之间存在长期争论(马,2010年)。标记线编码概念认为,瘙痒特异性初级传入神经纤维或“瘙痒感受器”将信息传递给专门用于传递瘙痒感觉的中枢上行感觉神经元。相比之下,群体编码机制基于这样一种假设,即瘙痒由可能同时接受瘙痒性和伤害性输入的神经元亚群发出信号。分别与辣椒素和异硫氰酸烯丙酯(芥子油)结合的热敏瞬时受体电位(TRP)通道TRPV1和TRPA1对疼痛传递很重要。有趣的是,缺乏TRPV1或TRPA1的基因敲除小鼠分别表现出较少的组胺或氯喹诱发的搔抓行为(今牧等人,2009年;沈等人,2007年;威尔逊等人,2011年),这表明瘙痒感受器表达TRPV1或TRPA1,它们可能位于瘙痒直接转导过程的下游。此外,这些发现意味着瘙痒感受器和伤害感受器都表达这些对致痛物质敏感的TRP通道。与此一致的是,电生理学研究表明,脊髓背角中大多数对致痒物质有反应的神经元对小鼠(秋山等人,2009a,2012b)、大鼠(金克斯和卡斯滕斯,2002年)和猴子(戴维森等人,2007年,2012年;西蒙娜等人,2004年)的致痛物质也有反应。有人推测,瘙痒由对致痒物质和致痛物质敏感的神经元亚群发出信号,而疼痛由对致痛物质有反应但对致痒物质无反应的神经元亚群发出信号(秋山等人,2010c;戴维森等人,2012年)。本章将讨论瘙痒和疼痛的脊髓编码以及有害反刺激对瘙痒的调节。