Yang Tong-Yuan, Uhlinger David J, Ayers Stephen A, O'Hara Denise M, Joyce Alison P
Biologics Clinical Pharmacology, Biotechnology Center of Excellence, Janssen R&D, LLC, Spring House, PA 19477, USA.
Bioanalysis. 2014 Apr;6(8):1049-57. doi: 10.4155/bio.14.60.
Method developers of plate-based ligand-binding assays (LBAs) often face challenges establishing selectivity, specificity and range of quantitation to meet the needs of a particular study. Case studies are presented to compare different ligand-binding immunoassay platforms (plate-based vs microfluidic system) in method development to support pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic studies.
Studies highlight the challenges of plate-based LBAs to establish selectivity, specificity and range of quantitation as a result of nonspecific background signal, matrix interference, lack of linearity and drug interference. The fast assay kinetics of a microfluidic immunoassay system was shown to generally reduce nonspecific background and matrix effects, while increasing assay linear range and drug tolerance.
The short incubation times with microfluidics can be beneficial for LBAs burdened by matrix effects and in these cases had superior assay performance compared with widely used immunoassay platforms in bioanalysis, for example, Meso Scale Discovery(®) and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay.
基于平板的配体结合分析(LBA)方法开发者在确定选择性、特异性和定量范围以满足特定研究需求时常常面临挑战。本文通过案例研究比较了不同的配体结合免疫分析平台(基于平板的平台与微流控系统)在方法开发中对药代动力学和药效学研究的支持情况。
研究突出了基于平板的LBA在确定选择性、特异性和定量范围时面临的挑战,这些挑战源于非特异性背景信号、基质干扰、缺乏线性以及药物干扰。微流控免疫分析系统快速的分析动力学通常可减少非特异性背景和基质效应,同时增加分析线性范围和药物耐受性。
微流控技术的短孵育时间对于受基质效应困扰的LBA可能有益,在这些情况下,与生物分析中广泛使用的免疫分析平台(例如,Meso Scale Discovery®和酶联免疫吸附测定)相比,其分析性能更优。