Jain Natasha A, Lu Kit, Ito Sawa, Muranski Pawel, Hourigan Christopher S, Haggerty Janice, Chokshi Puja D, Ramos Catalina, Cho Elena, Cook Lisa, Childs Richard, Battiwalla Minoo, Barrett A John
Hematology Branch, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
Hematology Branch, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
Cytotherapy. 2014 Jul;16(7):927-33. doi: 10.1016/j.jcyt.2014.02.010. Epub 2014 May 13.
Although cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection after allogeneic stem cell transplantation (SCT) is rarely fatal, the management of CMV by pre-emptive medication for viral reactivation has toxicity and carries a financial burden. New strategies to prevent CMV reactivation with vaccines and antiviral T cells may represent an advance over pre-emptive strategies but have yet to be justified in terms of transplantation outcome and cost.
We compared outcomes and post-transplantation treatment cost in 44 patients who never required pre-emptive CMV treatment with 90 treated patients undergoing SCT at our institute between 2006 and 2012. Eighty-one subjects received CD34+ selected myeloablative SCT, 12 umbilical cord blood transplants, and 41 T-replete non-myeloablative SCT. One hundred nineteen patients (89%) were at risk for CMV because either the donor or recipient was seropositive. Of these, 90 patients (75.6%) reactivated CMV at a median of 30 (range 8-105) days after transplantation and received antivirals.
There was no difference in standard transplantation risk factors between the two groups. In multivariate modeling, CMV reactivation >250 copies/mL (odds ratio = 3, P < 0.048), total duration of inpatient IV antiviral therapy (odds ratio = 1.04, P < 0.001), type of transplantation (T-deplete vs. T-replete; odds ratio = 4.65, P < 0.017) were found to be significantly associated with increased non-relapse mortality. The treated group incurred an additional cost of antiviral medication and longer hospitalization within the first 6 months after SCT of $58,000 to $74,000 per patient.
Our findings suggest that to prevent CMV reactivation, treatment should be given within 1 week of SCT. Preventative treatment may improve outcome and have significant cost savings.
尽管异基因干细胞移植(SCT)后巨细胞病毒(CMV)感染很少致命,但通过预激治疗来应对病毒再激活的CMV管理存在毒性且带来经济负担。用疫苗和抗病毒T细胞预防CMV再激活的新策略可能比预激策略有所进步,但在移植结局和成本方面仍有待论证。
我们比较了2006年至2012年间在我院接受SCT的44例从未需要进行CMV预激治疗的患者与90例接受治疗的患者的结局及移植后治疗成本。81例受试者接受了CD34+选择的清髓性SCT,12例接受了脐带血移植,41例接受了T细胞充足的非清髓性SCT。119例患者(89%)有CMV感染风险,因为供体或受体血清学呈阳性。其中,90例患者(75.6%)在移植后中位30天(范围8 - 105天)出现CMV再激活并接受了抗病毒治疗。
两组之间的标准移植风险因素没有差异。在多变量建模中,发现CMV再激活>250拷贝/mL(比值比 = 3,P < 0.048)、住院静脉抗病毒治疗的总持续时间(比值比 = 1.04,P < 0.001)、移植类型(T细胞去除与T细胞充足;比值比 = 4.65,P < 0.017)与非复发死亡率增加显著相关。治疗组在SCT后的前6个月内,每位患者的抗病毒药物额外成本和更长住院时间为58,000美元至74,000美元。
我们的研究结果表明,为预防CMV再激活,应在SCT后1周内进行治疗。预防性治疗可能改善结局并显著节省成本。