Suppr超能文献

难治性心源性休克的体外膜肺氧合支持:治疗策略及危险因素分析

Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support in refractory cardiogenic shock: treatment strategies and analysis of risk factors.

作者信息

Loforte Antonio, Marinelli Giuseppe, Musumeci Francesco, Folesani Gianluca, Pilato Emanuele, Martin Suarez Sofia, Montalto Andrea, Lilla Della Monica Paola, Grigioni Francesco, Frascaroli Guido, Menichetti Antonio, Di Bartolomeo Roberto, Arpesella Giorgio

机构信息

Department of Cardiovascular Surgery and Transplantation, S. Orsola-Malpighi Hospital, Bologna University, Bologna, Italy.

出版信息

Artif Organs. 2014 Jul;38(7):E129-41. doi: 10.1111/aor.12317. Epub 2014 May 20.

Abstract

Two centrifugal pumps, the RotaFlow (Maquet, Jostra Medizintechnik AG, Hirrlingen, Germany) and Levitronix CentriMag (Levitronix LCC, Waltham, MA, USA), used in central or peripheral veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) support systems have been investigated, in terms of double-center experience, as treatment for patients with refractory cardiogenic shock (CS). Between January 2006 and December 2012, 228 consecutive adult patients were supported on RotaFlow (n=213) or CentriMag (n=15) ECMO, at our institutions (155 men; age 58.3±10.5 years, range: 19-84 years). Indications for support were: failure to wean from cardiopulmonary bypass in the setting of postcardiotomy (n=118) and primary donor graft failure (n=37); postacute myocardial infarction CS (n=27); acute myocarditis (n=6); and CS on chronic heart failure (n=40). A peripheral ECMO setting was established in 126 (55.2%) patients while it was established centrally in 102 (44.7%). Overall mean support time was 10.9±9.7 days (range: 1-43 days). Eighty-four (36.8%) patients died on ECMO. Overall success rate, in terms of survival on ECMO (n=144), weaning from mechanical support (n=107; 46.9%), bridge to mid-long-term ventricular assist device (n=6; 2.6%), and bridge to heart transplantation (n=31; 13.5%), was 63.1%. One hundred twenty-two (53.5%) patients were successfully discharged. Stepwise logistic regression identified blood lactate level and MB isoenzyme of creatine kinase (CK-MB) relative index at 72 h after ECMO initiation, and number of packed red blood cells (PRBCs) transfused on ECMO as significant predictors of mortality on ECMO (P=0.010, odds ratio [OR]=2.94; 95% confidence interval [CI]=1.10-3.14; P=0.010, OR=2.82, 95% CI=1.014-3.721; and P=0.011, OR=2.69; 95% CI=1.06-4.16, respectively). Central ECMO population had significantly higher rate of continuous veno-venous hemofiltration need and bleeding requiring surgery events compared with the peripheral ECMO setting population. No significant differences were seen by comparing the RotaFlow and CentriMag populations in terms of device performance. At follow-up, persistent heart failure with left ventricle ejection fraction (LVEF)≤40% was a risk factor after hospital discharge. Patients with a poor hemodynamic status may benefit from rapid central or peripheral insertion of ECMO. The blood lactate level, CK-MB relative index, and PRBCs transfused should be strictly monitored during ECMO support. In addition, early ventricular assist device placement or urgent listing for heart transplant should be considered in patients with persistent impaired LVEF after ECMO.

摘要

我们对用于中心或外周静脉 - 动脉体外膜肺氧合(ECMO)支持系统的两种离心泵,即RotaFlow(迈柯唯,约斯特拉医疗技术股份公司,德国希尔林根)和Levitronix CentriMag(Levitronix有限责任公司,美国马萨诸塞州沃尔瑟姆),根据双中心经验进行了研究,以探讨其作为难治性心源性休克(CS)患者的治疗手段。在2006年1月至2012年12月期间,我们机构连续228例成年患者接受了RotaFlow(n = 213)或CentriMag(n = 15)ECMO支持(155名男性;年龄58.3±10.5岁,范围:19 - 84岁)。支持的适应证包括:心脏手术后无法脱离体外循环(n = 118)和原发性供体移植物功能衰竭(n = 37);急性心肌梗死后CS(n = 27);急性心肌炎(n = 6);以及慢性心力衰竭合并CS(n = 40)。126例(55.2%)患者采用外周ECMO设置,102例(44.7%)采用中心ECMO设置。总体平均支持时间为10.9±9.7天(范围:1 - 43天)。84例(36.8%)患者在ECMO治疗期间死亡。总体成功率,就ECMO存活(n = 144)、脱离机械支持(n = 107;46.9%)、过渡到中长期心室辅助装置(n = 6;2.6%)以及过渡到心脏移植(n = 31;13.5%)而言,为63.1%。122例(53.5%)患者成功出院。逐步逻辑回归分析确定了ECMO启动后72小时的血乳酸水平、肌酸激酶MB同工酶(CK - MB)相对指数以及ECMO期间输注的红细胞压积(PRBCs)数量是ECMO治疗期间死亡的重要预测因素(P = 0.010,比值比[OR] = 2.94;95%置信区间[CI] = 1.10 - 3.

14;P = 0.010,OR = 2.82,95% CI = 1.014 - 3.721;以及P = 0.011,OR = 2.69;95% CI = 1.06 - 4.16)。与外周ECMO设置人群相比,中心ECMO人群持续静脉 - 静脉血液滤过需求率和需要手术治疗的出血发生率显著更高。在设备性能方面,比较RotaFlow和CentriMag人群未发现显著差异。随访时,左心室射血分数(LVEF)≤40%的持续性心力衰竭是出院后的一个危险因素。血流动力学状态较差的患者可能从快速中心或外周置入ECMO中获益。在ECMO支持期间应严格监测血乳酸水平、CK - MB相对指数和输注的PRBCs数量。此外,对于ECMO后LVEF持续受损的患者,应考虑早期置入心室辅助装置或紧急列入心脏移植名单。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验