Tillman F D, Pool D R, Leake S A
U.S. Geological Survey, Arizona Water Science Center, 520 N. Park Ave., Ste. 221, Tucson, AZ 85719.
Ground Water. 2015 May-Jun;53(3):378-88. doi: 10.1111/gwat.12210. Epub 2014 May 19.
Simulating groundwater flow in basin-fill aquifers of the semiarid southwestern United States commonly requires decisions about how to distribute aquifer recharge. Precipitation can recharge basin-fill aquifers by direct infiltration and transport through faults and fractures in the high-elevation areas, by flowing overland through high-elevation areas to infiltrate at basin-fill margins along mountain fronts, by flowing overland to infiltrate along ephemeral channels that often traverse basins in the area, or by some combination of these processes. The importance of accurately simulating recharge distributions is a current topic of discussion among hydrologists and water managers in the region, but no comparative study has been performed to analyze the effects of different recharge distributions on groundwater simulations. This study investigates the importance of the distribution of aquifer recharge in simulating regional groundwater flow in basin-fill aquifers by calibrating a groundwater-flow model to four different recharge distributions, all with the same total amount of recharge. Similarities are seen in results from steady-state models for optimized hydraulic conductivity values, fit of simulated to observed hydraulic heads, and composite scaled sensitivities of conductivity parameter zones. Transient simulations with hypothetical storage properties and pumping rates produce similar capture rates and storage change results, but differences are noted in the rate of drawdown at some well locations owing to the differences in optimized hydraulic conductivity. Depending on whether the purpose of the groundwater model is to simulate changes in groundwater levels or changes in storage and capture, the distribution of aquifer recharge may or may not be of primary importance.
在美国西南部半干旱地区的盆地充填含水层中模拟地下水流动,通常需要就如何分配含水层补给量做出决策。降水可以通过直接入渗以及通过高海拔地区的断层和裂缝进行传输来补给盆地充填含水层,也可以通过在高海拔地区的地表径流,在盆地边缘沿山前地带入渗,或者通过在该地区经常横穿盆地的季节性河道的地表径流来入渗,或者通过这些过程的某种组合来补给。准确模拟补给分布的重要性是该地区水文地质学家和水资源管理者当前讨论的话题,但尚未进行比较研究来分析不同补给分布对地下水模拟的影响。本研究通过将地下水流模型校准到四种不同的补给分布(补给总量相同),研究了含水层补给分布在模拟盆地充填含水层区域地下水流中的重要性。在优化水力传导率值的稳态模型结果、模拟水头与实测水头的拟合情况以及传导率参数区的综合尺度敏感性方面可以看到相似之处。具有假设储存特性和抽水速率的瞬态模拟产生了相似的捕获率和储存变化结果,但由于优化水力传导率的差异,在一些井位的水位下降速率上存在差异。根据地下水模型的目的是模拟地下水位变化还是储存和捕获变化,含水层补给分布可能至关重要,也可能并非如此。