Graduate School of Clinical Dentistry, Institute for Clinical Dental Research, Korea University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
J Adv Prosthodont. 2014 Apr;6(2):115-20. doi: 10.4047/jap.2014.6.2.115. Epub 2014 Apr 22.
The aim of this in vitro study was to evaluate the effect of aging on the tear strength and cytotoxicity of four soft denture lining materials.
Four commonly used soft denture lining materials, (Coe-Comfort™ GC America Inc., Alsip, IL, USA; Coe-Soft™ GC America Inc., Alsip, IL, USA; Visco-gel Dentsply Caulk Milford, DE, USA; and Sofreliner Tough M Tokuyama Dental Corporation Tokyo, Japan) were selected. Sixty trouser-leg designed specimens per lining material were fabricated using a stainless steel mold for tear strength testing. The specimens were divided into non-thermocycling and 1000-, and 3000- thermocycling groups. For the cytotoxicity test, twenty-four disk shaped specimens per material were fabricated using a stainless steel mold. The specimens were soaked in normal saline solution for 24 h, 48 h and 72 h. Cytotoxicity was measured by XTT assay in L929 mouse fibroblasts. Data were analyzed by two way analysis of variance and Dunnett's test (P<.05).
Before thermocycling, Sofreliner Tough M (10.36 ± 1.00 N) had the highest tear strength value while Coe-Comfort™ (0.46 ± 0.10 N) had the lowest. After 3000 cycles, Sofreliner Tough M (9.65 ± 1.66 N) presented the highest value and Coe-Comfort™ (0.42 ± 0.08 N) the lowest. Sofreliner Tough M, in all incubation periods was the least toxic with significant differences compared to all other materials (P<.05). Coe-Comfort™, Coe-Soft™, and Sofreliner Tough M did not show any significant differences within their material group for all incubation periods.
This in vitro study revealed that aging can affect both the tear strength and cytotoxicity of soft denture materials depending on the composition.
本体外研究旨在评估老化对四种软衬材料的撕裂强度和细胞毒性的影响。
选择了四种常用的软衬材料(GC 美国公司的 Coe-Comfort™,伊利诺伊州阿尔斯普;GC 美国公司的 Coe-Soft™,伊利诺伊州阿尔斯普;Dentsply Caulk 的 Visco-gel Dentsply,特拉华州米尔福德;和日本东京的 Tokuyama Dental Corporation 的 Sofreliner Tough M)。用不锈钢模具制作每个衬垫材料的 60 个裤腿设计的试样,用于撕裂强度测试。将试样分为非热循环组和 1000 次、3000 次热循环组。对于细胞毒性测试,用不锈钢模具制作每个材料的 24 个圆盘状试样。将试样浸泡在生理盐水中 24 h、48 h 和 72 h。通过 XTT 测定法在 L929 小鼠成纤维细胞中测量细胞毒性。用双因素方差分析和 Dunnett 检验分析数据(P<.05)。
在热循环之前,Sofreliner Tough M(10.36 ± 1.00 N)具有最高的撕裂强度值,而 Coe-Comfort™(0.46 ± 0.10 N)具有最低的撕裂强度值。经过 3000 次循环后,Sofreliner Tough M(9.65 ± 1.66 N)呈现出最高值,而 Coe-Comfort™(0.42 ± 0.08 N)呈现出最低值。在所有孵育期内,Sofreliner Tough M 与所有其他材料相比毒性最小,差异具有统计学意义(P<.05)。在所有孵育期内,Coe-Comfort™、Coe-Soft™和 Sofreliner Tough M 之间在其材料组内均无显著差异。
本体外研究表明,老化会根据组成影响软衬材料的撕裂强度和细胞毒性。