Suppr超能文献

城市一级创伤中心外固定器的使用情况及相关成本分析。

Analysis of usage and associated cost of external fixators at an urban level 1 trauma centre.

作者信息

Chaus George W, Dukes Chase, Hak David J, Mauffrey Cyril, Mark Hammerberg E

机构信息

University of Colorado School of Medicine, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Aurora, CO, United States.

Madigan Army Medical Center, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Ft. Lewis, WA, United States.

出版信息

Injury. 2014 Oct;45(10):1611-3. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2014.04.031. Epub 2014 Apr 28.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To determine the usage, indication, duration, and cost associated with external fixation usage. Additionally, to show the significant cost associated with external fixator use and reinvigorate discussions on external fixator reuse.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PATIENTS: A retrospective review of a prospectively gathered trauma database was undertaken to identify all patients treated with external fixation frames for pelvic and lower extremity injuries between September 2007 and July 2010.

MAIN OUTCOME AND MEASURES

We noted the indications for frame use, and we determined the average duration of external fixation for each indication. The cost of each frame was calculated from implant records.

RESULTS

341 lower extremity and pelvic fractures were treated with external fixation frames during the study period. Of these, 92% were used as temporary external fixation. The average duration of temporary external fixation was 10.5 days. The cost of external fixation frame components was $670,805 per year. The average cost per external fixation frame was $5900.

CONCLUSIONS

The majority of external fixators are intended as temporary frames, in place for a limited period of time prior to definitive fixation of skeletal injuries. As such, most frames are not intended to withstand physiologic loads, nor are they expected provide a precise maintenance of reduction. Given the considerable expense associated with external fixation frame components, the practice of purchasing external fixation frame components as disposable "single-use" items appears to be somewhat wasteful.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level II.

摘要

目的

确定外固定器的使用情况、适应证、使用时长及相关费用。此外,展示外固定器使用所涉及的高昂成本,并重新引发关于外固定器重复使用的讨论。

设计、设置与患者:对前瞻性收集的创伤数据库进行回顾性分析,以确定2007年9月至2010年7月期间所有接受外固定架治疗骨盆和下肢损伤的患者。

主要结局与测量指标

我们记录了使用外固定架的适应证,并确定每种适应证的外固定平均时长。根据植入记录计算每个外固定架的成本。

结果

在研究期间,341例下肢和骨盆骨折接受了外固定架治疗。其中,92%用作临时外固定。临时外固定的平均时长为10.5天。外固定架组件的成本为每年670,805美元。每个外固定架的平均成本为5900美元。

结论

大多数外固定器用作临时固定架,在骨骼损伤最终固定前使用一段时间。因此,大多数外固定架并非设计用于承受生理负荷,也不期望其能精确维持复位。鉴于外固定架组件成本高昂,将外固定架组件作为一次性“即用即弃”物品购买的做法似乎有些浪费。

证据级别

二级。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验