Suppr超能文献

使用金属刮治器进行器械操作后钛种植体基台和牙骨质的表面划痕评估。

Surface scratch assessment of titanium implant abutments and cementum following instrumentation with metal curettes.

作者信息

Anastassiadis P M, Hall C, Marino V, Bartold P M

机构信息

Colgate Australian Clinical Dental Research Centre, Dental School, University of Adelaide, Frome Road, Adelaide, South Australia, 5005, Australia.

出版信息

Clin Oral Investig. 2015 Mar;19(2):545-51. doi: 10.1007/s00784-014-1257-7. Epub 2014 May 23.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

This study was conducted to compare the surface scratch resistance of titanium implant abutments and cementum to evaluate the impact of scaling with metal curettes on both surfaces.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A standard in vitro force of 14 N was used to assess the scratch width and depth created by curettes on extracted human tooth roots and titanium implant abutments. Scratch width and depth were analysed using a stereomicroscope and non-contact surface profilometry.

RESULTS

The mean force applied during test scaling procedures by experienced volunteer operators was 14 N. Mechanical scaling using this force in vitro of cementum produced a mean scratch width of 59.4 ± 1.9 μm, N = 20, and scratch depth of 0.86 ± 0.03 μm, N = 20, compared to the titanium abutments' mean scratch width of 30.8 ± 1.9 μm, N = 6, and scratch depth of 0.34 ± 0.02 μm, N = 6. These differences were statistically significant (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Although there a number of factors in the clinical situation which are not easily reproducible in vitro, this proof-of-principle in vitro study is the first to confirm quantitatively that titanium abutments had a significantly greater scratch resistance than cementum when metal curettes were used on these surfaces. This information should be considered, especially if there is a preferred choice of metal instruments for effective dental prophylactic procedures for the maintenance of titanium dental implants.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Clinical dogma suggests that titanium implant abutment surfaces should not be instrumented with metal instruments due to scratching of the surface. However, since cementum is softer than titanium, the logic of this tenet seems flawed. This study demonstrated for the first time that titanium abutments undergo less scratch damage during scaling with metal curettes than does cementum. Metal curettes may be used on titanium abutments with as much confidence as for root planing on natural teeth.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在比较钛种植体基台和牙骨质的表面抗刮性,以评估使用金属刮治器对两者表面进行刮治的影响。

材料与方法

使用14 N的标准体外力来评估刮治器在拔除的人牙根和钛种植体基台上产生的刮痕宽度和深度。使用体视显微镜和非接触式表面轮廓仪分析刮痕宽度和深度。

结果

经验丰富的志愿者操作者在测试刮治过程中施加的平均力为14 N。在体外,使用该力对牙骨质进行机械刮治时,平均刮痕宽度为59.4±1.9μm,N = 20,刮痕深度为0.86±0.03μm,N = 20;相比之下,钛基台的平均刮痕宽度为30.8±1.9μm,N = 6,刮痕深度为0.34±0.02μm,N = 6。这些差异具有统计学意义(P < 0.05)。

结论

尽管临床情况中有许多因素在体外不易重现,但这项原理验证性体外研究首次定量证实,当在这些表面使用金属刮治器时,钛基台的抗刮性明显高于牙骨质。应考虑这一信息,特别是在为维护钛牙种植体而进行有效的牙齿预防性操作时,如果对金属器械有首选。

临床意义

临床经验表明,由于表面刮擦,不应使用金属器械处理钛种植体基台表面。然而,由于牙骨质比钛软,这一原则的逻辑似乎存在缺陷。本研究首次证明,在使用金属刮治器刮治时,钛基台比牙骨质受到的刮痕损伤更小。在钛基台上使用金属刮治器时,可以像在天然牙上进行根面平整一样有信心。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验