Federal University of São Carlos, São Carlos, Brazil.
J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2014 Jul;44(7):475-87. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2014.4760. Epub 2014 May 22.
Randomized controlled trial with immediate follow-up.
To evaluate the immediate effects of a low-amplitude, high-velocity thrust thoracic spine manipulation (TSM) on pain and scapular kinematics during elevation and lowering of the arm in individuals with shoulder impingement syndrome (SIS). The secondary objective was to evaluate the immediate effects of TSM on scapular kinematics during elevation and lowering of the arm in individuals without symptoms.
Considering the regional interdependence among the shoulder and the thoracic and cervical spines, TSM may improve pain and function in individuals with SIS. Comparing individuals with SIS to those without shoulder pathology may provide information on the effects of TSM specifically in those with SIS.
Fifty subjects (mean ± SD age, 31.8 ± 10.9 years) with SIS and 47 subjects (age, 25.8 ± 5.0 years) asymptomatic for shoulder dysfunction were randomly assigned to 1 of 2 interventions: TSM or a sham intervention. Scapular kinematics were analyzed during elevation and lowering of the arm in the sagittal plane, and a numeric pain rating scale was used to assess shoulder pain during arm movement at preintervention and postintervention.
For those in the SIS group, shoulder pain was reduced immediately after TSM and the sham intervention (mean ± SD preintervention, 2.9 ± 2.5; postintervention, 2.3 ± 2.5; P<.01; moderate effect size [Cohen d = 0.2]). Scapular internal rotation increased 0.5° ± 0.02° (P = .04; small effect size [Cohen d<0.1]) during elevation of the arm after TSM and sham intervention in the SIS group only. Subjects with and without SIS who received TSM and asymptomatic subjects who received the sham intervention had a significant increase (1.6° ± 2.7°) in scapular upward rotation postintervention (P<.05; small effect size [Cohen d<0.2]), which was not considered clinically significant. Scapular anterior tilt increased 1.0° ± 4.8° during elevation and lowering of the arm postmanipulation (P<.05; small effect size [Cohen d<0.2]) in the asymptomatic subjects who received TSM.
Shoulder pain in individuals with SIS immediately decreased after a TSM. The observed changes in scapular kinematics following TSM were not considered clinically important.
Therapy, level 4. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2014;44(7):475-487. Epub 22 May 2014. doi:10.2519/jospt.2014.4760.
随机对照试验,随访即刻。
评估低频、高速推力式胸椎手法(TSM)对肩峰下撞击综合征(SIS)患者手臂抬高和降低时疼痛和肩胛骨运动学的即刻影响。次要目的是评估 TSM 对无症状个体手臂抬高和降低时肩胛骨运动学的即刻影响。
考虑到肩部与胸颈椎之间的区域相互依存关系,TSM 可能会改善 SIS 患者的疼痛和功能。将 SIS 患者与无肩部病理的患者进行比较,可以提供 TSM 对 SIS 患者的具体影响的信息。
50 名(平均±标准差年龄,31.8±10.9 岁)SIS 患者和 47 名(年龄,25.8±5.0 岁)无肩部功能障碍的无症状患者被随机分配到以下 2 种干预措施之一:TSM 或假干预。在矢状面分析手臂抬高和降低时的肩胛骨运动学,并在干预前后使用数字疼痛评分量表评估肩部疼痛在手臂运动时的情况。
对于 SIS 组,TSM 和假干预后即刻肩部疼痛减轻(平均±标准差,干预前 2.9±2.5;干预后 2.3±2.5;P<.01;中效应量[Cohen d=0.2])。只有 SIS 组的 TSM 和假干预后,手臂抬高时肩胛骨内旋增加 0.5°±0.02°(P=.04;小效应量[Cohen d<0.1])。接受 TSM 的 SIS 患者和接受假干预的无症状患者的肩胛骨上旋增加 1.6°±2.7°(P<.05;小效应量[Cohen d<0.2]),这被认为没有临床意义。接受 TSM 的无症状患者在手臂抬高和降低时,肩胛骨前倾角增加 1.0°±4.8°(P<.05;小效应量[Cohen d<0.2])。
SIS 患者接受 TSM 后,肩部疼痛即刻减轻。TSM 后观察到的肩胛骨运动学变化没有临床意义。
治疗,4 级。J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2014;44(7):475-487. Epub 2014 年 5 月 22 日。doi:10.2519/jospt.2014.4760.