Suppr超能文献

改善大学校园的无烟宣传:一种有助于理解学生对政策提案看法的新策略。

Improving tobacco-free advocacy on college campuses: a novel strategy to aid in the understanding of student perceptions about policy proposals.

作者信息

Niemeier Brandi S, Chapp Christopher B, Henley Whitney B

机构信息

a Department of Health, Physical Education, Recreation and Coaching, College of Education and Professional Studies , University of Wisconsin-Whitewater , Whitewater , Wisconsin.

出版信息

J Am Coll Health. 2014;62(7):498-505. doi: 10.1080/07448481.2014.925456.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Tobacco-control policy proposals are usually met with opposition on college campuses. Research to understand students' viewpoints about health-related policy proposals and messaging strategies, however, does not exist. This study investigated students' perceptions about a smoke-free policy proposal to help understand their positions of support and opposition and to inform the development of effective messaging strategies.

PARTICIPANTS

In January 2012, 1,266 undergraduate students from a midwestern university completed an online questionnaire about smoke-free campus policies.

METHODS

Responses were coded and analyzed using Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count software and chi-square, independent-samples t tests, and binary logistic models.

RESULTS

Most students who supported a smoke-free policy considered environmental or aesthetic conditions, whereas most opponents used personal freedom frames of thought. Supporters viewed smoking policies in personal terms, and opponents suggested means-ends policy reasoning.

CONCLUSIONS

Taken together, points of reference and emotions about proposed policies provided insight about participants' perspectives to help inform effective policy advocacy efforts.

摘要

目的

烟草控制政策提案在大学校园通常会遭到反对。然而,目前尚不存在旨在了解学生对与健康相关的政策提案及信息传播策略看法的研究。本研究调查了学生对无烟政策提案的看法,以帮助了解他们支持和反对的立场,并为制定有效的信息传播策略提供依据。

参与者

2012年1月,来自一所中西部大学的1266名本科生完成了一份关于无烟校园政策的在线问卷。

方法

使用语言查询与字数统计软件以及卡方检验、独立样本t检验和二元逻辑模型对回答进行编码和分析。

结果

大多数支持无烟政策的学生考虑的是环境或美观条件,而大多数反对者则采用个人自由的思维框架。支持者从个人角度看待吸烟政策,而反对者则提出手段-目的政策推理。

结论

总体而言,对拟议政策的参照点和情感为了解参与者的观点提供了见解,有助于为有效的政策宣传工作提供信息。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验