Suppr超能文献

老年愤世嫉俗型不信任、发生痴呆的风险与基于人群的队列研究中的死亡率。

Late-life cynical distrust, risk of incident dementia, and mortality in a population-based cohort.

机构信息

From the Department of Neurology (E.N., M.R., A.S., H.S., M.K., A.-M.T.) and Institute of Public Health and Clinical Nutrition (T.L.), University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio; Aging Research Center (A.S., M.K.), Karolinska Institutet and Stockholm University, Sweden; Department of Chronic Disease Prevention (T.N., T.L.), National Institute for Health and Welfare, Helsinki, Finland; Alzheimer Disease Research Center (T.N.), Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden; Hospital District of North Karelia (T.L.), Joensuu; and Department of Neurology (H.S.), Kuopio University Hospital, Finland.

出版信息

Neurology. 2014 Jun 17;82(24):2205-12. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000000528. Epub 2014 May 28.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

We investigated the association between late-life cynical distrust and incident dementia and mortality (mean follow-up times of 8.4 and 10.4 years, respectively) in the Cardiovascular Risk Factors, Aging and Dementia Study.

METHODS

Cynical distrust was measured based on the Cook-Medley Scale and categorized into tertiles. Cognitive status was evaluated with a 3-step protocol including screening, clinical phase, and differential diagnostic phase. Dementia was diagnosed according to DSM-IV criteria. Complete data on exposure, outcome, and confounders were available from 622 persons (46 dementia cases) for the dementia analyses and from 1,146 persons (361 deaths) for the mortality analyses. Age, sex, systolic blood pressure, total cholesterol, fasting glucose, body mass index, socioeconomic background, smoking, alcohol use, self-reported health, and APOE genotype were considered as confounders.

RESULTS

Cynical distrust was not associated with dementia in the crude analyses, but those with the highest level of cynical distrust had higher risk of dementia after adjusting for confounders (relative risk 3.13; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.15-8.55). Higher cynical distrust was associated with higher mortality in the crude analyses (hazard ratio 1.40; 95% CI 1.05-1.87) but the association was explained by confounders (adjusted hazard ratio 1.19; 95% CI 0.86-1.61).

CONCLUSIONS

Higher cynical distrust in late life was associated with higher mortality, but this association was explained by socioeconomic position, lifestyle, and health status. Association between cynical distrust and incident dementia became evident when confounders were considered. This novel finding suggests that both psychosocial and lifestyle-related risk factors may be modifiable targets for interventions. We acknowledge the need for larger replication studies.

摘要

目的

我们研究了心血管风险因素、衰老和痴呆研究中老年期愤世嫉俗的不信任与痴呆和死亡的关联(平均随访时间分别为 8.4 年和 10.4 年)。

方法

愤世嫉俗的不信任是基于 Cook-Medley 量表进行测量的,并分为三个三分位数。认知状态通过包括筛查、临床阶段和鉴别诊断阶段的三步方案进行评估。根据 DSM-IV 标准诊断痴呆。在痴呆分析中,我们使用了 622 人(46 例痴呆病例)的完整暴露、结局和混杂因素数据,在死亡率分析中,我们使用了 1146 人(361 例死亡)的完整暴露、结局和混杂因素数据。年龄、性别、收缩压、总胆固醇、空腹血糖、体重指数、社会经济背景、吸烟、饮酒、自我报告健康状况和 APOE 基因型被认为是混杂因素。

结果

在未校正分析中,愤世嫉俗的不信任与痴呆无关,但在调整混杂因素后,愤世嫉俗程度最高的人患痴呆的风险更高(相对风险 3.13;95%置信区间 [CI] 1.15-8.55)。在未校正分析中,较高的愤世嫉俗程度与较高的死亡率相关(危险比 1.40;95%置信区间 [CI] 1.05-1.87),但这种关联可以用混杂因素来解释(调整后的危险比 1.19;95%置信区间 [CI] 0.86-1.61)。

结论

老年期较高的愤世嫉俗程度与较高的死亡率相关,但这种关联可以用社会经济地位、生活方式和健康状况来解释。在考虑混杂因素后,愤世嫉俗与新发痴呆之间的关联变得明显。这一新颖的发现表明,心理社会和与生活方式相关的风险因素可能是干预的可调节目标。我们承认需要更大的复制研究。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验