Division of Oncology/Unit of Urology, URI, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy.
Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, University of Montreal Health Centre, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Eur Urol. 2015 Feb;67(2):212-9. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2014.05.011. Epub 2014 Jun 2.
The role of extended pelvic lymph node dissection (ePLND) in treating prostate cancer (PCa) patients with lymph node invasion (LNI) remains controversial.
The relationship between the number of removed lymph nodes (RLNs) and cancer-specific mortality (CSM) was tested in patients with LNI.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: We examined data of 315 pN1 PCa patients treated with radical prostatectomy (RP) and anatomically ePLND between 2000 and 2012 at one tertiary care centre. All patients received adjuvant hormonal therapy with or without adjuvant radiotherapy (aRT).
Univariable and multivariable Cox regression analyses tested the relationship between RLN number and CSM rate, after adjusting to all available covariates. Survival estimates were based on the multivariable model; patients were stratified according to RLN number using points of maximum separation.
The average number of RLNs was 20.8 (median: 19; interquartile range: 14-25). Mean and median follow-up were 63.1 and 54 mo, respectively. At 10-yr, the CSM-free survival rate was 74.7%, 85.9%, 92.4%, 96.0%, and 97.9% for patients with 8, 17, 26, 36, and 45 RLNs, respectively. By multivariable analyses, the number of RLNs independently predicted lower CSM rate (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.93; p=0.02). Other predictors of CSM were Gleason score 8-10 (HR: 3.3), number of positive nodes (HR: 1.2), and aRT treatment (HR: 0.26; all p ≤ 0.006). The study is limited by its retrospective nature.
In PCa patients with LNI, the removal of a higher number of LNs during RP was associated with improvement in cancer-specific survival rate. This implies that ePLND should be considered in all patients with a significant preoperative risk of harbouring LNI.
We found that removing more lymph nodes during prostate cancer surgery can significantly improve cancer-specific survival in patients with lymph node invasion.
在有淋巴结侵犯(LNI)的前列腺癌(PCa)患者中,扩大盆腔淋巴结清扫术(ePLND)的作用仍存在争议。
本研究旨在检测 LNI 患者中清扫淋巴结数目(RLNs)与癌症特异性死亡率(CSM)之间的关系。
设计、地点和参与者:我们分析了 2000 年至 2012 年在一家三级医疗中心接受根治性前列腺切除术(RP)和解剖性 ePLND 的 315 例 pN1 PCa 患者的数据。所有患者均接受辅助激素治疗,联合或不联合辅助放疗(aRT)。
单变量和多变量 Cox 回归分析调整了所有可用协变量后,检测 RLN 数量与 CSM 率之间的关系。生存估计基于多变量模型;根据 RLN 数量进行分层,使用最大分离点。
平均 RLN 数为 20.8(中位数:19;四分位距:14-25)。平均和中位随访时间分别为 63.1 和 54 个月。在 10 年时,8、17、26、36 和 45 RLN 患者的 CSM 无复发生存率分别为 74.7%、85.9%、92.4%、96.0%和 97.9%。多变量分析显示,RLN 数量独立预测较低的 CSM 率(风险比[HR]:0.93;p=0.02)。CSM 的其他预测因素包括 Gleason 评分 8-10(HR:3.3)、阳性淋巴结数量(HR:1.2)和 aRT 治疗(HR:0.26;均 p≤0.006)。该研究的局限性在于其回顾性。
在有 LNI 的 PCa 患者中,RP 时切除更多的淋巴结与 CSM 率的提高相关。这意味着应考虑对术前有明显 LNI 风险的所有患者进行 ePLND。
我们发现,在前列腺癌手术中切除更多的淋巴结可以显著提高有淋巴结侵犯的患者的癌症特异性生存率。