Anderson Maureen E C, Sargeant Jan M, Weese J Scott
Department of Pathobiology, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON, Canada.
BMC Vet Res. 2014 May 7;10:106. doi: 10.1186/1746-6148-10-106.
Hand hygiene is considered one of the most important infection control measures in human healthcare settings, but there is little information available regarding hand hygiene frequency and technique used in veterinary clinics. The objectives of this study were to describe hand hygiene practices associated with routine appointments in companion animal clinics in Ontario, and the effectiveness of a poster campaign to improve hand hygiene compliance.
Observation of hand hygiene practices was performed in 51 clinics for approximately 3 weeks each using 2 small wireless surveillance cameras: one in an exam room, and one in the most likely location for hand hygiene to be performed outside the exam room following an appointment. Data from 38 clinics were included in the final analysis, including 449 individuals, 1139 appointments before and after the poster intervention, and 10894 hand hygiene opportunities. Overall hand hygiene compliance was 14% (1473/10894), while before and after patient contact compliance was 3% (123/4377) and 26% (1145/4377), respectively. Soap and water was used for 87% (1182/1353) of observed hand hygiene attempts with a mean contact time of 4 s (median 2 s, range 1-49 s), while alcohol-based hand rub (ABHR) was used for 7% (98/1353) of attempts with a mean contact time of 8 s (median 7 s, range 1-30 s). The presence of the posters had no significant effect on compliance, although some staff reported that they felt the posters did increase their personal awareness of the need to perform hand hygiene, and the posters had some effect on product contact times.
Overall hand hygiene compliance in veterinary clinics in this study was low, and contact time with hand hygiene products was frequently below current recommendations. Use of ABHR was low despite its advantages over hand washing and availability in the majority of clinics. The poster campaign had a limited effect on its own, but could still be used as a component of a multimodal hand hygiene campaign. Improving the infection control culture in veterinary medicine would facilitate future campaigns and studies in this area, as well as overall patient and staff safety.
手部卫生被认为是人类医疗环境中最重要的感染控制措施之一,但关于兽医诊所手部卫生频率和使用技术的信息却很少。本研究的目的是描述安大略省伴侣动物诊所常规预约相关的手部卫生习惯,以及海报宣传活动提高手部卫生依从性的效果。
使用2个小型无线监控摄像头在51家诊所对手部卫生习惯进行观察,每家诊所观察约3周,一个摄像头放置在检查室,另一个放置在预约后检查室外最有可能进行手部卫生的位置。最终分析纳入了38家诊所的数据,包括449名个体、海报干预前后的1139次预约以及10894次手部卫生机会。总体手部卫生依从率为14%(1473/10894),而在接触患者之前和之后的依从率分别为3%(123/4377)和26%(1145/4377)。观察到的手部卫生操作中有87%(1182/1353)使用肥皂和水,平均接触时间为4秒(中位数2秒,范围1 - 49秒),而使用酒精类擦手液(ABHR)的操作占7%(98/1353),平均接触时间为8秒(中位数7秒,范围1 - 30秒)。海报的存在对依从性没有显著影响,尽管一些工作人员表示他们觉得海报确实提高了他们对手部卫生必要性的个人意识,并且海报对产品接触时间有一定影响。
本研究中兽医诊所总体手部卫生依从率较低,与手部卫生产品的接触时间经常低于当前建议。尽管ABHR相较于洗手具有优势且在大多数诊所都有供应,但使用频率较低。海报宣传活动本身效果有限,但仍可作为多模式手部卫生宣传活动的一个组成部分。改善兽医医学中的感染控制文化将有助于该领域未来的宣传活动和研究,以及整体患者和工作人员的安全。