Illemann Martin, Laerum Ole Didrik, Hasselby Jane Preuss, Thurison Tine, Høyer-Hansen Gunilla, Nielsen Hans Jørgen, Christensen Ib Jarle
The Finsen Laboratory, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark; Biotech Research and Innovation Center (BRIC), University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Cancer Med. 2014 Aug;3(4):855-64. doi: 10.1002/cam4.242. Epub 2014 May 30.
Patients were identified from a population-based prospective study of 4990 individuals with symptoms associated with colorectal cancer (CRC). A total of 244 CRC tissue samples were available for immunohistochemical staining of uPAR, semiquantitatively scored at the invasive front, and in the tumor core on cancer cells, macrophages, and myofibroblasts. In addition, the levels of the intact and cleaved uPAR-forms in blood from the same patients are evaluated in this study. In a univariate analysis, the number of uPAR-positive versus uPAR-negative macrophages (HR = 2.26, [95% CI: 1.39-3.66, P = 0.0009]) and cancer cells (HR=1.49, [95% CI: 1.01-2.20, P = 0.047]) located in the tumor core were significantly associated to overall survival. In a multivariate analysis, uPAR-positive versus uPAR-negative macrophages located in the tumor core showed the best separation of patients with positive score associated to poor prognosis (HR = 1.84 [95% CI: 1.12-3.04, P = 0.017]). In a multivariate analysis including clinical covariates and soluble uPAR(I), the latter was significantly associated to overall survival (HR = 2.68 [95% CI: 1.90-3.79, P < 0.0001]) and uPAR-positive macrophages in the tumor core remained significantly associated to overall survival (HR = 1.81 [95% CI: 1.08-3.01, P = 0.023]). Membrane-bound uPAR showed additive effects with the circulating uPAR(I) and stage, giving a hazard ratio of 12 between low and high scores. Thus, combining stage, uPAR(I) in blood and uPAR on macrophages in the tumor core increase the prognostic precision more than tenfold, as compared to stage alone.
患者来自一项基于人群的前瞻性研究,该研究涉及4990名有结直肠癌(CRC)相关症状的个体。共有244份CRC组织样本可用于uPAR的免疫组织化学染色,在侵袭前沿以及肿瘤核心部位的癌细胞、巨噬细胞和成肌纤维细胞上进行半定量评分。此外,本研究还评估了同一患者血液中完整和裂解的uPAR形式的水平。在单变量分析中,肿瘤核心部位uPAR阳性与uPAR阴性巨噬细胞(风险比=2.26,[95%置信区间:1.39 - 3.66,P = 0.0009])以及癌细胞(风险比=1.49,[95%置信区间:1.01 - 2.20,P = 0.047])的数量与总生存期显著相关。在多变量分析中,肿瘤核心部位uPAR阳性与uPAR阴性巨噬细胞对预后不良相关阳性评分的患者区分效果最佳(风险比 = 1.84 [95%置信区间:1.12 - 3.04,P = 0.017])。在包括临床协变量和可溶性uPAR(I)的多变量分析中,后者与总生存期显著相关(风险比 = 2.68 [95%置信区间:1.90 - 3.79,P < 0.0001]),肿瘤核心部位uPAR阳性巨噬细胞仍与总生存期显著相关(风险比 = 1.81 [95%置信区间:1.08 - 3.01,P = 0.023])。膜结合uPAR与循环uPAR(I)和分期显示出相加效应,低分与高分之间的风险比为12。因此,与单独使用分期相比,结合分期、血液中的uPAR(I)以及肿瘤核心部位巨噬细胞上的uPAR可使预后精度提高十倍以上。