McDevitt Joe, Melby Vidar
Urgent Care and Treatment Centre, Tyrone County Hospital, Omagh, UK.
J Clin Nurs. 2015 Feb;24(3-4):523-35. doi: 10.1111/jocn.12639. Epub 2014 Jun 1.
To evaluate the quality of the emergency nurse practitioner service provided to people presenting to a rural urgent care centre with minor injuries. The three objectives that were focused were an evaluation of the safety and effectiveness of the emergency nurse practitioner service, an assessment of patients' satisfaction with the emergency nurse practitioner service and a determination of factors that may enhance the quality of the emergency nurse practitioner service.
Urgent care centres have become increasingly prevalent across the UK. Emergency nurse practitioner services at these rural urgent care centres remain largely unevaluated. This study attempts to redress this deficit by evaluating the quality of an emergency nurse practitioner service in relation to the care of patients presenting with minor injuries to a rural urgent care centre.
This descriptive study used a case-note review and a survey design with one open-ended exploratory question.
Patient views were collected using a self-completed questionnaire and a data extraction tool to survey patients' case notes retrospectively.
Despite comparatively low total length-of-stay times, most patients felt they had enough time to discuss things fully with the emergency nurse practitioner. Although emergency nurse practitioners routinely impart injury advice, feedback from some patients suggests a need for the provision of more in-depth information regarding their injury. The vast majority (97·3%) of patients felt that the quality of the emergency nurse practitioner service was of a high standard. Contrary to some other studies, the findings in this study indicate that patient satisfaction is not influenced by waiting times.
Emergency nurse practitioners in rural urgent care centres have the potential to deliver a safe and effective quality service that is reflected in high levels of patient satisfaction.
This study provides some evidence to support the continued expansion of the emergency nurse practitioner service in rural settings in the UK.
评估为前往农村紧急护理中心就诊的轻伤患者提供的急诊护士执业服务质量。重点关注的三个目标是评估急诊护士执业服务的安全性和有效性、评估患者对急诊护士执业服务的满意度以及确定可能提高急诊护士执业服务质量的因素。
紧急护理中心在英国日益普遍。这些农村紧急护理中心的急诊护士执业服务在很大程度上仍未得到评估。本研究试图通过评估农村紧急护理中心为轻伤患者提供护理的急诊护士执业服务质量来弥补这一不足。
本描述性研究采用病例记录回顾和带有一个开放式探索性问题的调查设计。
通过自我填写问卷和数据提取工具收集患者意见,以回顾性调查患者的病例记录。
尽管总住院时间相对较短,但大多数患者认为他们有足够的时间与急诊护士执业者充分讨论事情。尽管急诊护士执业者常规提供受伤建议,但一些患者的反馈表明需要提供更多关于其伤势的深入信息。绝大多数(97.3%)患者认为急诊护士执业服务质量达到高标准。与其他一些研究相反,本研究结果表明患者满意度不受等待时间影响。
农村紧急护理中心的急诊护士执业者有潜力提供安全有效的高质量服务,这体现在患者的高度满意度上。
本研究提供了一些证据,支持在英国农村地区继续扩大急诊护士执业服务。