Parsons Kelly, Goepp Julius, Dechairo Bryan, Fowler Elizabeth, Markward Nathan, Hanaway Patrick, McBride Teresa, Landis Darryl
Express Scripts, St Louis, Missouri (Dr Parsons), United States.
Lupine Creative Consulting (Dr Goepp), United States.
Glob Adv Health Med. 2014 May;3(3):25-32. doi: 10.7453/gahmj.2013.100.
To evaluate the economic utility of a fecal biomarker panel structured to suggest alternative, treatable diagnoses in patients with symptoms of irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) by quantifying, comparing, and contrasting health service costs between tested and non-tested patients.
Retrospective, matched cohort study comparing direct medical costs for IBS patients undergoing fecal biomarker testing with those of matched control subjects.
We examined de-identified medical and pharmacy claims of a large American pharmacy benefit manager to identify plan members who underwent panel testing, were eligible for covered benefits for at least 180 days prior to the test date, and had data available for 30, 90, and 365 days after that date. We used propensity score matching to develop population-based control cohorts for each tested cohort, comprised of records with IBS-related diagnoses but for which panel testing was not performed. Primary outcome measures were diagnostic and medical services costs as determined from claims data.
Two hundred nine records from tested subjects met inclusion criteria. The only significant baseline differences between groups were laboratory costs, which were significantly higher in each tested cohort. At each follow-up time point, total medical and gastrointestinal procedural costs were significantly higher in non-tested cohorts. Within tested cohorts, costs declined significantly from baseline, while costs rose significantly in non-tested control cohorts; these differences were also significant between groups at each time point.
Structured fecal biomarker panel testing was associated with significantly lower medical and gastrointestinal procedural costs in this study of patients with IBS symptoms.
通过对接受检测和未接受检测的患者的医疗服务成本进行量化、比较和对比,评估一种粪便生物标志物组合的经济效用,该组合旨在为肠易激综合征(IBS)患者提供可替代的、可治疗的诊断建议。
回顾性匹配队列研究,比较接受粪便生物标志物检测的IBS患者与匹配对照受试者的直接医疗成本。
我们检查了一家大型美国药房福利管理机构的匿名医疗和药房理赔记录,以识别接受组合检测、在检测日期前至少180天有资格享受承保福利且在该日期后30、90和365天有可用数据的计划成员。我们使用倾向得分匹配法为每个检测队列建立基于人群的对照队列,该对照队列由有IBS相关诊断但未进行组合检测的记录组成。主要结局指标是根据理赔数据确定的诊断和医疗服务成本。
209份来自检测受试者的记录符合纳入标准。两组之间唯一显著的基线差异是实验室成本,每个检测队列中的实验室成本显著更高。在每个随访时间点,未检测队列的总医疗和胃肠道诊疗程序成本显著更高。在检测队列中,成本从基线显著下降,而在未检测的对照队列中成本显著上升;这些差异在每个时间点的组间也很显著。
在这项针对有IBS症状患者进行的研究中,结构化粪便生物标志物组合检测与显著更低的医疗和胃肠道诊疗程序成本相关。