Scott I R, Vaughan A R S, Hall J
School for Health, University of Bath, Bath, UK; Isle of Man Institute of Sport, Douglas, Isle of Man.
Isle of Man Institute of Sport, Douglas, Isle of Man.
Phys Ther Sport. 2015 Feb;16(1):40-4. doi: 10.1016/j.ptsp.2014.02.007. Epub 2014 Mar 12.
This study examined the effects of sitting surfaces on the cross-sectional area of lumbar multifidus (LM) in patients with Chronic Low Back Pain (CLBP) and healthy controls (HC).
Cross-Sectional Case Controlled Study.
Isle of Man Institute of Sport.
40 age and sex matched, sporting participants aged 18-45 years, recruited from private physiotherapy practice patients (n = 20 CLBP, 16 male, 4 female, and n = 20 healthy controls, 16 males and 4 females).
Cross-sectional area of LM was measured using rehabilitative ultrasound imaging.
Swiss Ball (SB) was more effective at stimulating LM than a Stable Surface (SS) in both groups: CLBP:SB:12.3 (cm(2)) (SD:3.6), SS:10.15 (SD:2.6), p < 0.0001; HC:SB:12.5 (SD:2.7), SS:11.3 (SD:2.9), p < 0.0001). No significant differences between groups were noted. No differences between left and right side cross-sectional areas between or within groups were noted.
Cross-sectional area of LM increased as the lability of the surface increased, demonstrating that SB was more effective at stimulating LM activity than a non-labile surface. This confirms current clinical practice and supports the use of a labile surface in spinal rehabilitation. The lack of LM asymmetry within and between groups is discussed.
本研究探讨了坐面对于慢性下腰痛(CLBP)患者和健康对照者(HC)腰多裂肌(LM)横截面积的影响。
横断面病例对照研究。
马恩岛体育学院。
从私人理疗诊所患者中招募了40名年龄和性别匹配的18 - 45岁体育参与者(n = 20名CLBP患者,16名男性,4名女性;n = 20名健康对照者,16名男性,4名女性)。
使用康复超声成像测量LM的横截面积。
在两组中,瑞士球(SB)在刺激LM方面比稳定表面(SS)更有效:CLBP组:SB:12.3(cm²)(标准差:3.6),SS:10.15(标准差:2.6),p < 0.0001;HC组:SB:12.5(标准差:2.7),SS:11.3(标准差:2.9),p < 0.0001。未观察到组间有显著差异。组间或组内左右侧横截面积均未观察到差异。
随着表面不稳定性增加,LM的横截面积增大,表明SB在刺激LM活动方面比非不稳定表面更有效。这证实了当前的临床实践,并支持在脊柱康复中使用不稳定表面。文中讨论了组内和组间LM缺乏不对称性的情况。