Martin F, Beaugrand J P, Laguë P C
Unité d'Éthométrie, Département de Psychologie de l'Université du Québec à Montréal, CP Succursale 8888 Centre Ville, Montréal, Québec H3c 3P8, Canada.
Department of Animal Science, MacDonald Campus of McGill University, 21111 Lakeshore Road, Sainte-Anne de Bellevue, Québec H9X 3V9, Canada.
Behav Processes. 1997 Nov;41(2):139-50. doi: 10.1016/s0376-6357(97)00040-5.
This study simultaneously varied experiences of recent victory or defeat, 2-h familiarity with the meeting place, and hen weight in order to understand their combined effects on the establishment of dyadic dominance relationships between hens not previously acquainted with each other. Three kinds of encounters were arranged: (i) a previous winner unfamiliar with the meeting place met a previous loser familiar with the meeting place (n=28 dyads); (ii) a previous winner met a previous loser, both unfamiliar with the meeting place (n=27); (iii) a previous winner familiar with the meeting place encountered a previous loser unfamiliar with the meeting place (n=28). The weight asymmetry was combined with these three types of encounters by selecting hens showing various weight differences, in favour of the recent loser in 54 dyads and of the recent winner in 29 dyads. Results indicate that recent victory or defeat experience significantly affected the outcome. Even an important weight asymmetry, or familiarity with the meeting place were not sufficient for a hen recently defeated to overcome an opponent that was previously victorious. A 2-h period of familiarization with the meeting place did not provide any significant advantage over unfamiliarity. Although a significant relationship was found to exist between comb and wattles areas and the initial and final statuses, examination of partial correlations indicates that the influence was from initial status to final status, rather than from comb and wattles to final status. These results suggest that more importance should be attributed to recent social experience in comparison to intrinsic factors in determining dyadic dominance in the hen.
本研究同时改变近期胜负经历、对会面地点2小时的熟悉程度以及母鸡体重,以了解它们对彼此不熟悉的母鸡之间二元支配关系建立的综合影响。安排了三种相遇情况:(i)一只不熟悉会面地点的先前获胜者与一只熟悉会面地点的先前失败者相遇(n = 28对);(ii)一只先前获胜者与一只先前失败者相遇,两者都不熟悉会面地点(n = 27);(iii)一只熟悉会面地点的先前获胜者与一只不熟悉会面地点的先前失败者相遇(n = 28)。通过选择表现出不同体重差异的母鸡,将体重不对称与这三种相遇类型相结合,其中54对中有利于近期失败者,29对中有利于近期获胜者。结果表明,近期的胜负经历显著影响结果。即使存在显著的体重不对称,或者对会面地点的熟悉程度,也不足以让近期失败的母鸡战胜先前获胜的对手。与不熟悉相比,对会面地点2小时的熟悉并没有提供任何显著优势。虽然发现鸡冠和肉垂面积与初始和最终状态之间存在显著关系,但偏相关分析表明,影响是从初始状态到最终状态,而不是从鸡冠和肉垂到最终状态。这些结果表明,在确定母鸡的二元支配地位时,与内在因素相比,近期的社会经历应被赋予更大的重要性。