LaFrance Michael-Anne, McLachlan Kaitlyn, Nash Kelly, Andrew Gail, Loock Christine, Oberlander Tim F, Koren Gideon, Rasmussen Carmen
J Popul Ther Clin Pharmacol. 2014;21(2):e197-210. Epub 2014 May 20.
There is a growing need for validated tools to screen children at risk of fetal alcohol spectrum disorders (FASD). The Neurobehavioral Screening Tool (NST) is one of several promising screening measures for FASD, though further evidence is needed to establish the tool's psychometric utility.
To assess the predictive accuracy of the NST among children with an FASD diagnosis, with prenatal alcohol exposure (PAE) but no FASD diagnosis, and typically developing controls.
The NST was completed by caregivers of children ages 6 to 17, including 48 with FASD, 22 with PAE, and 32 typically developing non-exposed controls. Predictive accuracy coefficients were calculated using Nash et al. (2006) criteria, and compared against controls. An alternative scoring scheme was also investigated to determine optimum referral thresholds using item-level total scores.
The NST yielded 62.5% sensitivity for participants with FASD and 50% for PAE. Specificity values were 100% with no typically developing control scoring positive. Within the FASD group there was a trend for higher sensitivity among adolescents aged 12 to17 (70.8%) compared with children aged 6 to 11 years (54.2%), p = 0.23.
The findings support a growing body of literature evidencing psychometric promise for the clinical utility of the NST as an FASD screening tool, though further research on possible age-effects is warranted. The availability of a validated clinical screening tool for FASD, such as the NST, would aid in accurately screening a large number of children and lead to a timelier diagnostic referral.
对于用于筛查有胎儿酒精谱系障碍(FASD)风险儿童的经过验证的工具的需求日益增长。神经行为筛查工具(NST)是几种有前景的FASD筛查措施之一,不过还需要更多证据来确定该工具的心理测量效用。
评估NST在已诊断为FASD的儿童、有产前酒精暴露(PAE)但未诊断为FASD的儿童以及发育正常的对照组儿童中的预测准确性。
6至17岁儿童的照料者完成了NST测试,其中包括48名患有FASD的儿童、22名有PAE的儿童以及32名发育正常的未暴露对照组儿童。使用纳什等人(2006年)的标准计算预测准确性系数,并与对照组进行比较。还研究了一种替代评分方案,以使用项目级总分来确定最佳转诊阈值。
NST对患有FASD的参与者的敏感性为62.5%,对有PAE的参与者的敏感性为50%。特异性值为100%,发育正常的对照组中无人得分呈阳性。在FASD组中,12至17岁青少年的敏感性(70.8%)高于6至11岁儿童(54.2%),但差异无统计学意义(p = 0.23)。
这些发现支持了越来越多的文献,证明NST作为一种FASD筛查工具在临床应用方面具有心理测量学前景,不过有必要对可能的年龄效应进行进一步研究。像NST这样经过验证的FASD临床筛查工具的可用性,将有助于准确筛查大量儿童并实现更及时的诊断转诊。