• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

培训期间评估:开发一种自动筛选工具以衡量报告质量。

In-training evaluations: developing an automated screening tool to measure report quality.

作者信息

Bismil Ramprasad, Dudek Nancy L, Wood Timothy J

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

Med Educ. 2014 Jul;48(7):724-32. doi: 10.1111/medu.12490.

DOI:10.1111/medu.12490
PMID:24909534
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

In-training evaluation (ITE) is used to assess resident competencies in clinical settings. This assessment is documented on an evaluation report (In-Training Evaluation Report [ITER]). Unfortunately, the quality of these reports can be questionable. Therefore, training programmes to improve report quality are common. The Completed Clinical Evaluation Report Rating (CCERR) was developed to assess completed report quality and has been shown to do so in a reliable manner, thus enabling the evaluation of these programmes. The CCERR is a resource-intensive instrument, which may limit its use. The purpose of this study was to create a screening measure (Proxy-CCERR) that can predict the CCERR outcome in a less resource-intensive manner.

METHODS

Using multiple regression, the authors analysed a dataset of 269 ITERs to create a model that can predict the associated CCERR scores. The resulting predictive model was tested on the CCERR scores for an additional sample of 300 ITERs.

RESULTS

The quality of an ITER, as measured by the CCERR, can be predicted using a model involving only three variables (R(2)  = 0.61). The predictive variables included the total number of words in the comments, the variability of the ratings and the proportion of comment boxes completed on the form.

CONCLUSIONS

It is possible to model CCERR scores in a highly predictive manner. The predictive variables can be easily extracted in an automated process. Because this model is less resource-intensive than the CCERR, it makes it possible to provide feedback from ITER training programmes to large groups of supervisors and institutions, and even to create automated feedback systems using Proxy-CCERR scores.

摘要

目的

培训期间评估(ITE)用于评估住院医师在临床环境中的能力。该评估记录在一份评估报告(培训期间评估报告[ITER])中。不幸的是,这些报告的质量可能存在问题。因此,提高报告质量的培训项目很常见。已开发出完整临床评估报告评分(CCERR)来评估完整报告的质量,并已证明其评估方式可靠,从而能够对这些项目进行评估。CCERR是一种资源密集型工具,这可能会限制其使用。本研究的目的是创建一种筛选措施(Proxy-CCERR),能够以资源消耗较少的方式预测CCERR结果。

方法

作者使用多元回归分析了269份ITER的数据集,以创建一个能够预测相关CCERR分数的模型。在另外300份ITER样本的CCERR分数上对所得预测模型进行了测试。

结果

使用仅包含三个变量的模型(R² = 0.61),可以预测由CCERR衡量的ITER质量。预测变量包括评论中的单词总数、评分的可变性以及表格上填写的评论框比例。

结论

以高度预测性的方式对CCERR分数进行建模是可能的。预测变量可以在自动化过程中轻松提取。由于该模型比CCERR资源消耗少,因此有可能向大量的主管和机构提供来自ITER培训项目的反馈,甚至使用Proxy-CCERR分数创建自动反馈系统。

相似文献

1
In-training evaluations: developing an automated screening tool to measure report quality.培训期间评估:开发一种自动筛选工具以衡量报告质量。
Med Educ. 2014 Jul;48(7):724-32. doi: 10.1111/medu.12490.
2
Quality in-training evaluation reports--does feedback drive faculty performance?培训中质量评估报告——反馈能否促进教师表现?
Acad Med. 2013 Aug;88(8):1129-34. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e318299394c.
3
Assessing the quality of supervisors' completed clinical evaluation reports.评估督导完成的临床评估报告的质量。
Med Educ. 2008 Aug;42(8):816-22. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2008.03105.x. Epub 2008 Jun 14.
4
The Quality of Assessment of Learning (Qual) Score: Validity Evidence for a Scoring System Aimed at Rating Short, Workplace-Based Comments on Trainee Performance.学习评估质量(Qual)评分:旨在对学员表现的短期、基于工作场所的简短评语进行评分的评分系统的效度证据。
Teach Learn Med. 2020 Jun-Jul;32(3):319-329. doi: 10.1080/10401334.2019.1708365. Epub 2020 Feb 4.
5
Do in-training evaluation reports deserve their bad reputations? A study of the reliability and predictive ability of ITER scores and narrative comments.住院医师年度考评报告是否真的那么糟糕?对 ITER 评分和叙事性评语的可靠性和预测能力的研究。
Acad Med. 2013 Oct;88(10):1539-44. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e3182a36c3d.
6
Does faculty development influence the quality of in-training evaluation reports in pharmacy?教师发展是否会影响药学住院医师培训评估报告的质量?
BMC Med Educ. 2017 Nov 21;17(1):222. doi: 10.1186/s12909-017-1054-5.
7
Daily Encounter Cards-Evaluating the Quality of Documented Assessments.日常接触卡片——评估记录评估的质量。
J Grad Med Educ. 2016 Oct;8(4):601-604. doi: 10.4300/JGME-D-15-00505.1.
8
An exploration of faculty perspectives on the in-training evaluation of residents.对住院医师培训评估中教师观点的探索。
Acad Med. 2010 Jul;85(7):1157-62. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e3181e19722.
9
Supervisor-trainee continuity and the quality of work-based assessments.带教老师与实习生的连续性及基于工作的评估质量。
Med Educ. 2017 Dec;51(12):1260-1268. doi: 10.1111/medu.13415. Epub 2017 Oct 3.
10
Comparing the Ottawa Emergency Department Shift Observation Tool (O-EDShOT) to the traditional daily encounter card: measuring the quality of documented assessments.比较渥太华急诊科班次观察工具(O-EDShOT)与传统的日常接诊卡:评估记录评估质量。
CJEM. 2021 May;23(3):383-389. doi: 10.1007/s43678-020-00070-y. Epub 2021 Jan 29.

引用本文的文献

1
"But Why?": Explanatory Feedback Is a Reliable Marker of High-Quality Narrative Assessment of Surgical Performance.“但为什么呢?”:解释性反馈是手术表现高质量叙事评估的可靠标志。
Acad Med. 2025 May 1;100(5):614-620. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000005985. Epub 2025 Jan 31.
2
Use the right words: evaluating the effect of word choice and word count on quality of narrative feedback in ophthalmology competency-based medical education assessments.使用恰当的词汇:评估词汇选择和词汇数量对眼科基于胜任力的医学教育评估中叙事反馈质量的影响。
Can Med Educ J. 2024 Dec 31;15(6):58-63. doi: 10.36834/cmej.76671. eCollection 2024 Dec.
3
Novel In-Training Evaluation Report in an Internal Medicine Residency Program: Improving the Quality of the Narrative Assessment.
内科住院医师培训项目中的新型培训评估报告:提高叙述性评估的质量
J Med Educ Curric Dev. 2023 Oct 9;10:23821205231206058. doi: 10.1177/23821205231206058. eCollection 2023 Jan-Dec.
4
Validity evidence for the Quality of Assessment for Learning score: a quality metric for supervisor comments in Competency Based Medical Education.学习评估质量得分的效度证据:基于胜任力的医学教育中督导评语的质量指标
Can Med Educ J. 2022 Nov 15;13(6):19-35. doi: 10.36834/cmej.74860. eCollection 2022 Nov.
5
Developing a dashboard for faculty development in competency-based training programs: a design-based research project.为基于能力的培训项目开发教师发展仪表盘:一个基于设计的研究项目。
Can Med Educ J. 2021 Sep 14;12(4):48-64. doi: 10.36834/cmej.72067. eCollection 2021 Sep.
6
Comparing the Ottawa Emergency Department Shift Observation Tool (O-EDShOT) to the traditional daily encounter card: measuring the quality of documented assessments.比较渥太华急诊科班次观察工具(O-EDShOT)与传统的日常接诊卡:评估记录评估质量。
CJEM. 2021 May;23(3):383-389. doi: 10.1007/s43678-020-00070-y. Epub 2021 Jan 29.
7
Daily Encounter Cards-Evaluating the Quality of Documented Assessments.日常接触卡片——评估记录评估的质量。
J Grad Med Educ. 2016 Oct;8(4):601-604. doi: 10.4300/JGME-D-15-00505.1.