Dianati Maleki Neda, Van de Werf Frans, Goldstein Patrick, Adgey Jennifer A, Lambert Yves, Sulimov Vitaly, Rosell-Ortiz Fernando, Gershlick Anthony H, Zheng Yinggan, Westerhout Cynthia M, Armstrong Paul W
Canadian VIGOUR Centre, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada.
Department of Cardiology, University Hospital Gasthuisberg, Leuven, Belgium.
Heart. 2014 Oct;100(19):1543-9. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2014-306023. Epub 2014 Jun 10.
We evaluated the prespecified endpoint, aborted myocardial infarction (AbMI), according to the use of a pharmacoinvasive (PI) strategy versus primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in 1754 patients randomised within 3 h of symptom onset in the STrategic Reperfusion Early After Myocardial infarction (STREAM) trial.
Based on sequential ECG's and biomarkers, AbMI was defined as ST-elevation resolution ≥50% (90 min posttenecteplase (TNK) in the PI arm or 30 min postprimary PCI) with minimal biomarker rise.
In the PI arm 11.1% (n=99) had AbMI versus 6.9% (n=59) in primary PCI arm (p<0.01). In a multivariable model, AbMI patients overall had less baseline ΣST-deviation, fewer baseline Q-waves and shorter total ischaemic times. PI AbMI patients had faster time to TNK (90 vs 100 min, p=0.015): total ischaemic time was 100 min longer in primary PCI AbMI patients and no difference in ischaemic time existed between AbMI and non-AbMI patients within this group. Although no significant interaction between treatment and AbMI on the composite endpoint of death/shock/congestive heart failure/recurrent MI occurred (p=0.292), PI AbMI patients had a lower incidence in this endpoint than non-AbMI patients (5.1 vs 12%, p=0.038); this was not evident in primary PCI patients. Forty-five patients (ie, 2.5%) had masquerading MI with minimal biomarker elevation and no evolution in baseline ST-elevation.
A PI strategy of early fibrinolysis more frequently aborts MI than primary PCI. Such PI patients had more favourable outcomes as compared with non-AbMIs. Diligent review of ECG evolution in STEMI distinguishes AbMI from infarct masquerade. ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT00623623.
在心肌梗死早期战略再灌注(STREAM)试验中,我们对1754例症状发作3小时内随机分组的患者,根据药物侵入性(PI)策略与直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)的使用情况,评估预先设定的终点——梗死中止(AbMI)。
基于连续心电图和生物标志物,AbMI被定义为ST段抬高消退≥50%(PI组替奈普酶(TNK)后90分钟或直接PCI后30分钟)且生物标志物升高 minimal。
PI组11.1%(n = 99)发生AbMI,直接PCI组为6.9%(n = 59)(p < 0.01)。在多变量模型中,总体而言,AbMI患者基线ΣST段偏移较小、基线Q波较少且总缺血时间较短。PI组AbMI患者至TNK时间更快(90分钟对100分钟,p = 0.015):直接PCI组AbMI患者的总缺血时间长100分钟,且该组内AbMI患者与非AbMI患者的缺血时间无差异。尽管治疗与AbMI在死亡/休克/充血性心力衰竭/再发心肌梗死复合终点上无显著相互作用(p = 0.292),但PI组AbMI患者该终点的发生率低于非AbMI患者(5.1%对12%,p = 0.038);在直接PCI患者中不明显。45例患者(即2.5%)有伪装心肌梗死,生物标志物升高 minimal且基线ST段抬高无进展。
早期纤溶的PI策略比直接PCI更频繁地中止心肌梗死。与非AbMI患者相比,此类PI患者有更有利的结局。对ST段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)心电图演变进行仔细评估可区分AbMI与梗死伪装。临床试验注册号:NCT00623623。