Technischen Universität München, München, Germany.
United European Gastroenterol J. 2013 Oct;1(5):329-34. doi: 10.1177/2050640613498589.
Acute upper abdominal pain is a frequent symptom leading to hospital admission.
To determine whether a primary intra- and extraluminal diagnostic approach enabled by endoscopic ultrasound is as effective as a conventional diagnostic algorithm of transabdominal ultrasound followed by oesophagogastroduodenoscopy.
A total of 240 patients who presented with acute right-sided and/or upper abdominal pain were prospectively recruited. Exclusion criteria were chronic pain, malignancy, prior abdominal surgery, bleeding, peritonitis, and elevated liver enzymes or lipase as defined 3-times higher than upper reference value. All patients underwent first transabdominal ultrasound and were then randomized (1 : 1) to either endoscopy followed by endoscopic ultrasound or vice versa. Patients and respective examiners were blinded to prior findings.
A total of 223 patients were included. Endoscopic ultrasound provided a higher diagnostic yield than the combination of transabdominal ultrasound and endoscopy (62.3 vs. 50.7%; p = 0.001). For mucosal/intraluminal lesions, we observed a very good agreement between both endoscopic modalities (kappa 0.89). The agreement for pancreatic and biliary causes was good between both ultrasound modalities (kappa 0.66).
Due to its high diagnostic yield, endoscopic ultrasound as a primary diagnostic modality appears to be a valuable option in patients with acute upper abdominal pain.
急性上腹痛是导致住院的常见症状。
确定内镜超声引导的原发性腔内和腔外诊断方法是否与经腹超声后行食管胃十二指肠镜检查的传统诊断方案同样有效。
共前瞻性纳入 240 例出现急性右侧和/或上腹痛的患者。排除标准为慢性疼痛、恶性肿瘤、既往腹部手术、出血、腹膜炎以及肝酶或脂肪酶升高,定义为高于上参考值 3 倍。所有患者均首先接受经腹超声检查,然后按 1:1 比例随机分为内镜检查后行内镜超声检查组或反之。患者和相应的检查者均对先前的检查结果不知情。
共纳入 223 例患者。内镜超声的诊断率高于经腹超声联合内镜检查(62.3% vs. 50.7%;p = 0.001)。对于黏膜/腔内病变,两种内镜检查方法之间具有很好的一致性(kappa 值为 0.89)。两种超声检查方法在胰腺和胆道病因方面的一致性也较好(kappa 值为 0.66)。
由于诊断率较高,内镜超声作为原发性诊断方法似乎是急性上腹痛患者的一种有价值的选择。