Bledsoe Jacob R, Kamionek Michal, Mino-Kenudson Mari
Department of Pathology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA.
Am J Surg Pathol. 2014 Oct;38(10):1418-28. doi: 10.1097/PAS.0000000000000263.
In colorectal carcinoma the evaluation of BRAF mutation status is increasingly being performed given its utility as a prognostic and predictive biomarker. However, there are conflicting reports of the sensitivity and specificity of BRAF V600E immunohistochemistry (IHC), and little is known about its reliability in tissues collected from metastatic sites or after chemotherapy, radiation therapy and/or targeted therapy. The degree of intratumoral staining heterogeneity is also not well established. We performed IHC for BRAF V600E (VE1) on 204 cases of colorectal carcinoma including 59 with the BRAF V600E mutation. These included primary (n=147) and metastatic/recurrent (n=57) tumors, collected before (n=133) or after (n=71) chemotherapy, radiation therapy and/or targeted therapy. Evaluation of a test cohort (39 cases) with knowledge of mutation status established a specific staining pattern for the mutation: diffuse cytoplasmic staining of near-uniform intensity, regardless of strength of staining. Using this pattern, pathologists at 3 levels of training independently performed blinded evaluation of the remaining cases. BRAF V600E staining was 96.3% sensitive and 98.5% specific for the mutation, including both pretreatment and posttreatment specimens. Fleiss κ for interobserver agreement was 0.96. Staining of whole sections of the BRAF mutants showed diffuse staining in all cases and uniform or near-uniform intensity in 91%. In 20 cases with both pretreatment and posttreatment specimens, there was 100% accuracy and agreement in staining between samples. We conclude that BRAF V600E IHC is reliable for the evaluation of mutational status in colorectal carcinoma regardless of site or prior treatment history, and staining shows a high degree of intratumoral homogeneity.
鉴于BRAF突变状态作为一种预后和预测生物标志物的实用性,在结直肠癌中对其进行评估的情况越来越普遍。然而,关于BRAF V600E免疫组织化学(IHC)的敏感性和特异性存在相互矛盾的报道,对于其在从转移部位收集的组织中或化疗、放疗和/或靶向治疗后的可靠性知之甚少。肿瘤内染色异质性的程度也尚未明确。我们对204例结直肠癌进行了BRAF V600E(VE1)免疫组织化学检测,其中59例存在BRAF V600E突变。这些病例包括原发性肿瘤(n = 147)和转移性/复发性肿瘤(n = 57),在化疗、放疗和/或靶向治疗之前(n = 133)或之后(n = 71)收集。在已知突变状态的测试队列(39例)中进行评估,确定了该突变的特异性染色模式:强度近乎一致的弥漫性细胞质染色,与染色强度无关。采用这种模式,三个培训水平的病理学家对其余病例进行了独立的盲法评估。BRAF V600E染色对该突变的敏感性为96.3%,特异性为98.5%,包括治疗前和治疗后的标本。观察者间一致性的Fleiss κ为0.96。BRAF突变体的全切片染色在所有病例中均显示弥漫性染色,91%的病例强度均匀或近乎均匀。在20例同时有治疗前和治疗后标本的病例中,样本间染色的准确性和一致性为100%。我们得出结论,无论肿瘤部位或既往治疗史如何,BRAF V600E免疫组织化学对于评估结直肠癌的突变状态都是可靠的,并且染色显示出高度的肿瘤内同质性。