Fülöp Vilmos, Szigetvári Iván, Szepesi János, Végh György, Berkowitz Ross S
J Reprod Med. 2014 May-Jun;59(5-6):227-34.
To compare the clinical management of patients with high-risk gestational trophoblastic neoplasia (GTN) among the periods of 1977-1990, 1991-2000, and 2001-2012 at the National Trophoblastic Disease Center of Hungary and to assess the efficacy of the FIGO 2000 staging and risk factor scoring system in comparison to the original WHO prognostic scoring system (1983).
We reviewed the medical records of 185 patients with high-risk GTN. From 1977-2000, patients were classified according to the original WHO prognostic scoring system (1983). From 2001-2012, high-risk patients were categorized by the FIGO 2000 system. We assessed the efficacy of MAC and EMA-CO primary combination chemotherapies. For 1977-2006 and 2007-2012 we assessed the efficacy of MAC and EMA-CO primary combination chemotherapies.
From 1977-1990, 63 high-risk patients (average, 4-5 patients/year), from 1991-2000, 50 high-risk patients (average, 5 patients/year), and from 2001-2012, 72 high-risk patients (average, 6 patients/year) were treated primarily with combination chemotherapy (MAC and/or EMA-CO and/or CEB). From 1977-2006, 100 high-risk patients received MAC primary combination chemotherapy and 17 cases received EMA-CO. The ratio of primary MAC primarily with and EMA-CO therapy among our high-risk patients was 5.9 (100/17) over the referred period. From 2007-2012, 21 high-risk patients were treated with primary MAC chemotherapy and 16 patients received EMA-CO. The MAC/EMA-CO ratio over this time interval was 1.3 (21/16).
We attained complete remission in 95.7% of the high-risk patients. During the last 6 years the use of EMA-CO primary combination chemotherapy increased among our high-risk patients, which has resulted in increased efficacy and fewer side effects.
比较1977 - 1990年、1991 - 2000年以及2001 - 2012年期间匈牙利国家滋养细胞疾病中心高危妊娠滋养细胞肿瘤(GTN)患者的临床管理情况,并评估国际妇产科联盟(FIGO)2000分期和风险因素评分系统相较于原始世界卫生组织(WHO)预后评分系统(1983年)的有效性。
我们回顾了185例高危GTN患者的病历。1977 - 2000年期间,患者根据原始WHO预后评分系统(1983年)进行分类。2001 - 2012年期间,高危患者按照FIGO 2000系统进行分类。我们评估了MAC和EMA - CO一线联合化疗的有效性。对于1977 - 2006年和2007 - 2012年,我们评估了MAC和EMA - CO一线联合化疗的有效性。
1977 - 1990年,63例高危患者(平均每年4 - 5例),1991 - 2000年,50例高危患者(平均每年5例),2001 - 2012年,72例高危患者(平均每年6例)主要接受联合化疗(MAC和/或EMA - CO和/或CEB)。1977 - 2006年,100例高危患者接受MAC一线联合化疗,17例接受EMA - CO。在所提及时间段内,我们高危患者中接受MAC和EMA - CO一线治疗的比例为5.9(100/17)。2007 - 2012年,21例高危患者接受MAC一线化疗,16例接受EMA - CO。此时间段内MAC/EMA - CO比例为1.3(21/16)。
我们使95.7%的高危患者实现了完全缓解。在过去6年中,我们高危患者中EMA - CO一线联合化疗的使用增加,这导致疗效提高且副作用减少。