Suppr超能文献

Retraction of statins article is not in the public interest: better characterisation of benefits and risks is crucial.

作者信息

Fahey Tom, Smith Susan

机构信息

Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland Medical School, Dublin 2, Republic of Ireland

Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland Medical School, Dublin 2, Republic of Ireland.

出版信息

BMJ. 2014 Jun 18;348:g4028. doi: 10.1136/bmj.g4028.

Abstract
摘要

相似文献

4
The BMJ statins papers misrepresent the facts.
BMJ. 2014 Jun 18;348:g4030. doi: 10.1136/bmj.g4030.
5
Risks and benefits of statins in lupus erythematosus.
Arch Intern Med. 2004 Jan 12;164(1):107-8. doi: 10.1001/archinte.164.1.107-b.
6
Authors' reply to Huffman and colleagues.
BMJ. 2014 Feb 26;348:g1523. doi: 10.1136/bmj.g1523.
7
Authors' reply to Davis and Dietrich.
BMJ. 2014 Feb 26;348:g1792. doi: 10.1136/bmj.g1792.
8
Is cholesterol lowering with statins the gold standard for treating patients with cardiovascular risk and disease?
South Med J. 2003 Aug;96(8):837; author reply 837-8. doi: 10.1097/01.SMJ.0000084285.83054.1C.
9
Should people at low risk of cardiovascular disease take a statin?
BMJ. 2013 Oct 22;347:f6123. doi: 10.1136/bmj.f6123.
10
Risks in the balance: the statins row.
BMJ. 2014 Aug 7;349:g5007. doi: 10.1136/bmj.g5007.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验