Khanal A, Peterson G M, Castelino R L, Jose M D
Unit for Medication Outcomes Research and Education (UMORE), School of Pharmacy.
Intern Med J. 2014 Jun;44(6):591-6. doi: 10.1111/imj.12446.
To review the product information (PI) for various brands of the same generic drugs and investigate the extent to which information is currently available on dosing in renal impairment and the concordance between the dosing recommendations for the same generic drug.
The Monthly Index of Medical Specialities (MIMS) was examined for 28 generic drugs recommended to be used with caution in renal impairment. For each generic drug all available brands listed as having solid oral dosage form were recorded. For each identified brand, the current PI was consulted and data referring to renal impairment was collated. The dissimilarity between these PI regarding the renal dosage recommendation was determined.
There was generally a lack of detailed information in the PI on the use of drugs in patients with renal impairment. The majority of PI documents (88 of 155 PI; 57%) provided quantitative dosage recommendations, but this was often not detailed enough to help users to make an informed decision. For 37 PI documents (24%), an altered dosage regimen was proposed without a quantifiable measure of renal function reported in the dose recommendation. The renal function severity category terms used and the associated quantitative values were also not consistent. It was observed that the recommendations varied among different brands of hydromorphone, morphine, oxycodone, tramadol, metformin and topiramate.
The reporting of renal function quantification methods, and associated dosage recommendations, in PI requires standardisation to ensure optimal drug dosing. Regularly updating of PI is also necessary.
回顾同一通用名药物不同品牌的产品信息(PI),并调查目前关于肾功能损害时给药信息的可得程度以及同一通用名药物给药建议之间的一致性。
查阅《医学专科月度索引》(MIMS)中28种建议在肾功能损害时谨慎使用的通用名药物。对于每种通用名药物,记录所有列出的具有固体口服剂型的可用品牌。对于每个确定的品牌,查阅当前的PI并整理有关肾功能损害的数据。确定这些PI在肾脏给药建议方面的差异。
PI中关于肾功能损害患者用药的详细信息普遍缺乏。大多数PI文件(155份PI中的88份;57%)提供了定量给药建议,但往往不够详细,无法帮助使用者做出明智的决定。对于37份PI文件(24%),提出了改变的给药方案,但在剂量建议中未报告可量化的肾功能指标。所使用的肾功能严重程度类别术语以及相关的定量值也不一致。观察到不同品牌的氢吗啡酮、吗啡、羟考酮、曲马多、二甲双胍和托吡酯的建议存在差异。
PI中肾功能量化方法及相关给药建议的报告需要标准化,以确保最佳给药剂量。PI的定期更新也很有必要。