Lee Miyoung, Zhu Weimo, Ackley-Holbrook Elizabeth, Brower Diana G, McMurray Bryan
Department of Sport, Health, and Rehabilitation, Kookmin University, South Korea.
University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, USA.
Disabil Health J. 2014 Jul;7(3):309-17. doi: 10.1016/j.dhjo.2014.02.004. Epub 2014 Feb 20.
It is critical to employ accurate measures when assessing physical activity (PA) barriers in any subpopulation, yet existing measures are not appropriate for persons with blindness or visual impairment (PBVI) due to a lack of validity or reliability evidence.
To develop and calibrate a PA barrier scale for PBVI.
An expert panel (n = 3) and 18 PBVI were recruited to establish content validity for a PA barriers subscale; 160 PBVI (96 females) completed the scale along with the Physical Activity Scale for Individuals with Physical Disabilities for calibration. To establish construct-related validity evidence, Confirmative factor analysis (CFA) and Rasch analysis were applied. To investigate internal consistency and reliability, Cronbach's alpha and the reliability coefficient (R) were employed, respectively.
Following CFA and Rasch analyses, five items were eliminated due to misfits; reliability coefficients were unchanged upon deletion of these items. The barriers perceived by PBVI to have the most negative impact on PA included "lack of self-discipline" (logit = 1.40) and "lack of motivation" (logit = 1.27). "Too many stairs in the exercise facility" (logit = -1.49) was perceived to have the least impact.
The newly-developed scale was found to be a valid and reliable tool for evaluating PA barriers in PBVI. To enhance promotion of health-producing levels of PA in PBVI, practitioners should consider applying this new tool as a precursor to programs aimed at improving PA participation in this group.
在评估任何亚人群的身体活动(PA)障碍时,采用准确的测量方法至关重要,但由于缺乏有效性或可靠性证据,现有的测量方法不适用于失明或视力障碍者(PBVI)。
为PBVI开发并校准PA障碍量表。
招募一个专家小组(n = 3)和18名PBVI来确定PA障碍子量表的内容效度;160名PBVI(96名女性)完成了该量表以及《身体残疾者身体活动量表》以进行校准。为了建立与结构相关的效度证据,应用了验证性因素分析(CFA)和拉施分析。为了研究内部一致性和可靠性,分别采用了克朗巴哈系数和可靠性系数(R)。
经过CFA和拉施分析,由于不匹配删除了5个项目;删除这些项目后可靠性系数未变。PBVI认为对PA影响最负面的障碍包括“缺乏自律”(logit = 1.40)和“缺乏动力”(logit = 1.27)。“健身设施楼梯太多”(logit = -1.49)被认为影响最小。
新开发的量表被发现是评估PBVI中PA障碍的有效且可靠的工具。为了加强对PBVI中产生健康水平的PA的推广,从业者应考虑应用这一新工具作为旨在提高该群体PA参与度的项目的先导。