Sheikh Ahmed B, Mendelson Zachary S, Liu James K
Department of Neurological Surgery, Center for Skull Base and Pituitary Surgery, Neurological Institute of New Jersey, Rutgers University, New Jersey Medical School, Newark, New Jersey, USA.
Department of Neurological Surgery, Center for Skull Base and Pituitary Surgery, Neurological Institute of New Jersey, Rutgers University, New Jersey Medical School, Newark, New Jersey, USA.
World Neurosurg. 2014 Dec;82(6):1187-97. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2014.06.024. Epub 2014 Jun 18.
Colloid cysts of the third ventricle have been successfully treated with transcranial microsurgical approaches. However, the endoscopic approach has recently been advocated as a lesser invasive technique. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of published studies to compare the outcomes between the two approaches.
A PubMED search of contemporary literature (1990-2014) was performed to identify surgical series of open and endoscopic treatment of colloid cysts. Relevant articles were identified and data were extracted concerning surgical treatment, extent of resection, and outcomes.
A meta-analysis was performed for recurrence rates based on treatment strategy. A total of 583 patients were included in the microsurgical group, and 695 patients in the endoscopic group. The microsurgical approach was found to have a significantly higher gross total resection rate (96.8% vs. 58.2%; P < 0.0001), lower recurrence rate (1.48% vs. 3.91%; P = 0.0003), and lower reoperation rate (0.38% vs. 3.0%; P = 0.0006) compared with the endoscopic group. There was no significant difference in mortality rate (1.4% vs. 0.6%) or shunt dependency (6.2% vs. 3.9%) between the two groups. The overall morbidity rate was lower in the endoscopic group (10.5%) than in the microsurgery group (16.3%). Within the microsurgery group, the transcallosal approach had a lower overall morbidity rate (14.4%) than the transcortical approach (24.5%).
Microsurgical resection of colloid cysts is associated with a higher rate of complete resection, lower rate of recurrence, and fewer reoperations than with endoscopic removal. However, the rate of morbidity is higher with microsurgery than with endoscopy.
经颅显微手术方法已成功用于治疗第三脑室胶样囊肿。然而,内镜手术方法近来被认为是一种侵入性较小的技术。我们对已发表的研究进行了系统评价和荟萃分析,以比较这两种手术方法的疗效。
在PubMed上检索当代文献(1990 - 2014年),以确定开放性手术和内镜治疗胶样囊肿的系列研究。确定相关文章,并提取有关手术治疗、切除范围和疗效的数据。
基于治疗策略对复发率进行了荟萃分析。显微手术组共纳入583例患者,内镜手术组共纳入695例患者。结果发现,与内镜手术组相比,显微手术方法的全切除率显著更高(96.8%对58.2%;P < 0.0001),复发率更低(1.48%对3.91%;P = 0.0003),再次手术率更低(0.38%对3.0%;P = 0.0006)。两组的死亡率(1.4%对0.6%)或分流依赖率(6.2%对3.9%)无显著差异。内镜手术组的总体发病率(10.5%)低于显微手术组(16.3%)。在显微手术组中,经胼胝体入路的总体发病率(14.4%)低于经皮质入路(24.5%)。
与内镜切除相比,显微手术切除胶样囊肿的完全切除率更高,复发率更低,再次手术更少。然而,显微手术的发病率高于内镜手术。