[常规结果监测有光明的未来吗?对将共同决策与结果监测相结合用于伴有身体和精神症状患者的调查]

[Does routine outcome monitoring have a promising future? An investigation into the use of shared decision-making combined with ROM for patients with a combination of physical and psychiatric symptoms].

作者信息

van der Feltz-Cornelis C M, Andrea H, Kessels E, Duivenvoorden H J, Biemans H, Metz M

出版信息

Tijdschr Psychiatr. 2014;56(6):375-84.

DOI:
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Although routine outcome monitoring (ROM) has been developed and widely used in the course of patient centered outcome research in the Netherlands, so far the technique has hardly ever been used to improve the treatment of individual patients.

AIM

To describe how a rom technique based on the principles of shared decision-making (SDM) was developed and evaluated at the Center for Body, Mind and Health at GGz Breburg, a specialised mental health institution in the Netherlands.

METHOD

We have developed a conceptual model for SDM that involves patient participation and the use of evidence-based decision-aids with cut-off scores.

RESULTS

According to the conceptual model for SDM that we developed, the patient and the health professional involved took 'shared' decisions in three phases; the decisions related to triage, the drawing-up of a treatment plan and a follow-up treatment course. At the end of the 6 month intake-phase 7 of the 67 patients who were deemed eligible for ROM/SDM were dropped from the study because they were incapable of performing ROM assessments. Due to diagnostic advice and referral at the end of the intake-phase, 25 patients did not require further treatment. Of the remaining 35 patients, 33 delivered at least one follow-up ROM assessment during the subsequent treatment phases. In these patients somatic and psychiatric symptoms were found to be significantly reduced.

CONCLUSION

ROM combined with sdm can be used successfully with patients who have a combination of physical and psychiatric symptoms and the technique can be applied by the professional in charge. Very few patients dropped out of the follow-up measurements and somatic as well as depressive or psychiatric symptoms diminished significantly. These findings indicate that a Randomised Clinical Trial is warranted in order to test the effectiveness of sdm combined with ROM as a decision-making instrument.

摘要

背景

尽管常规结果监测(ROM)已在荷兰以患者为中心的结果研究过程中得到开发并广泛应用,但迄今为止,该技术几乎从未用于改善个体患者的治疗。

目的

描述基于共同决策(SDM)原则的ROM技术是如何在荷兰一家专业心理健康机构GGz Breburg的身心与健康中心开发和评估的。

方法

我们开发了一个用于SDM的概念模型,该模型涉及患者参与以及使用带有临界值分数的循证决策辅助工具。

结果

根据我们开发的SDM概念模型,患者和相关医疗专业人员在三个阶段做出“共同”决策;这些决策涉及分诊、制定治疗计划和后续治疗过程。在为期6个月的纳入期结束时,67名被认为符合ROM/SDM条件的患者中有7名因无法进行ROM评估而退出研究。由于在纳入期结束时的诊断建议和转诊,25名患者无需进一步治疗。在其余35名患者中,33名在随后的治疗阶段至少进行了一次随访ROM评估。在这些患者中,躯体和精神症状被发现显著减轻。

结论

ROM与SDM相结合可以成功应用于患有躯体和精神症状的患者,并且该技术可由负责的专业人员应用。很少有患者退出随访测量,躯体以及抑郁或精神症状显著减轻。这些发现表明有必要进行一项随机临床试验,以测试SDM与ROM相结合作为一种决策工具的有效性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索