Suppr超能文献

表面处理及粘结剂类型对氧化锆桩核推出粘结强度的影响

Effect of surface treatment and type of cement on push-out bond strength of zirconium oxide posts.

作者信息

Almufleh Balqees S, Aleisa Khalil I, Morgano Steven M

机构信息

Postgraduate student, Department of Prosthetic Dental Sciences, College of Dentistry, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

Associate Professor, Department of Prosthetic Dental Sciences, College of Dentistry, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

出版信息

J Prosthet Dent. 2014 Oct;112(4):957-63. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2014.04.022. Epub 2014 Jun 19.

Abstract

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM

The effect of the surface treatment of zirconium oxide posts on their push-out bond strength is controversial.

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to compare the effects of 2 surface treatments on the bond strength of zirconium oxide posts cemented with different cements and to assess the failure mode.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Seventy extracted human teeth were divided into 7 groups (n=10). Custom zirconium oxide posts (Cercon; Degudent) were fabricated for 6 groups. Posts in 3 groups were airborne-particle abraded (A). Posts in the other 3 groups were tribochemical silica coated (T). Three cements were used. Zinc phosphate cement was used to cement the zirconium oxide posts in groups AZ and TZ, RelyX ARC cement was used in groups ARA and TRA, and RelyX Unicem cement was used in groups ARU and TRU. Group C contained custom metal posts cemented with zinc phosphate cement. Specimens were horizontally sectioned into 3 sections and subjected to a push-out test. A mixed model analysis of variance, 1-way ANOVA, and the Tukey multiple comparison tests were used for statistical analysis.

RESULTS

The highest push-out bond strength was recorded for Group ARU (21.03 MPa), and the lowest was recorded for Group ARA (7.57 MPa). No significant difference in push-out bond strength was found among the different surface treatments and root regions (P>.05). The type of cement had a significant effect on the push-out bond strength of zirconium oxide posts (P=.049). RelyX Unicem cement recorded (19.57 ±8.83 MPa) significantly higher push-out bond strength compared with zinc phosphate (9.95 ±6.31 MPa) and RelyX ARC cements (9.39 ±5.45 MPa). Adhesive failure at the post-cement interface was recorded for 75% of the posts cemented with zinc phosphate and RelyX ARC cements, while mixed failure was recorded for 75% of the posts cemented with RelyX Unicem cement.

CONCLUSIONS

The type of cement used resulted in a statistically significant difference in the push-out bond strength of zirconium oxide posts, while both the surface treatment and root region resulted in no statistically significant effect after artificial aging. RelyX Unicem cement had significantly higher push-out bond strength than did zinc phosphate and RelyX ARC cements.

摘要

问题陈述

氧化锆桩表面处理对其推出粘结强度的影响存在争议。

目的

本研究旨在比较两种表面处理对用不同粘结剂粘结的氧化锆桩粘结强度的影响,并评估失效模式。

材料与方法

将70颗拔除的人牙分为7组(n = 10)。为6组制作定制的氧化锆桩(Cercon;Degudent)。3组桩进行空气颗粒研磨(A)。另外3组桩进行摩擦化学硅涂层处理(T)。使用了三种粘结剂。AZ组和TZ组使用磷酸锌粘结剂粘结氧化锆桩,ARA组和TRA组使用RelyX ARC粘结剂,ARU组和TRU组使用RelyX Unicem粘结剂。C组包含用磷酸锌粘结剂粘结的定制金属桩。将标本水平切成3段并进行推出试验。采用混合模型方差分析、单因素方差分析和Tukey多重比较检验进行统计分析。

结果

ARU组的推出粘结强度最高(21.03 MPa),ARA组最低(7.57 MPa)。不同表面处理和牙根区域之间的推出粘结强度无显著差异(P>0.05)。粘结剂类型对氧化锆桩的推出粘结强度有显著影响(P = 0.049)。与磷酸锌粘结剂(9.95±6.31 MPa)和RelyX ARC粘结剂(9.39±5.45 MPa)相比,RelyX Unicem粘结剂的推出粘结强度显著更高(19.57±8.83 MPa)。用磷酸锌粘结剂和RelyX ARC粘结剂粘结的桩中,75%记录为桩 - 粘结剂界面的粘结失效,而用RelyX Unicem粘结剂粘结的桩中,有75%记录为混合失效。

结论

所用粘结剂类型导致氧化锆桩的推出粘结强度在统计学上有显著差异,而人工老化后表面处理和牙根区域均未产生统计学上的显著影响。RelyX Unicem粘结剂的推出粘结强度显著高于磷酸锌粘结剂和RelyX ARC粘结剂。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验