Innasimuthu Antony Leslie, Kumar Sanjay, Lazar Jason, Katz William E
Cardiovascular Division (Drs. Innasimuthu, Kumar, and Lazar), State University of New York-Downstate Medical Center, Brooklyn, New York 11203; and Cardiovascular Institute (Dr. Katz), Scaife Hall, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15213.
Tex Heart Inst J. 2014 Jun 1;41(3):273-9. doi: 10.14503/THIJ-13-3167. eCollection 2014 Jun.
Because the natural progression of low-gradient aortic stenosis (LGAS) has not been well defined, we performed a retrospective study of 116 consecutive patients with aortic stenosis who had undergone follow-up echocardiography at a median interval of 698 days (range, 371-1,020 d). All patients had preserved left ventricular ejection fraction (>0.50) during and after follow-up. At baseline, patients were classified by aortic valve area (AVA) as having mild stenosis (≥1.5 cm(2)), moderate stenosis (≥1 to <1.5 cm(2)), or severe stenosis (<1 cm(2)). Severe aortic stenosis was further classified by mean gradient (LGAS, mean <40 mmHg; high-gradient aortic stenosis [HGAS], mean ≥40 mmHg). We compared baseline and follow-up values among 4 groups: patients with mild stenosis, moderate stenosis, LGAS, and HGAS. At baseline, 30 patients had mild stenosis, 54 had moderate stenosis, 24 had LGAS, and 8 had HGAS. Compared with the moderate group, the LGAS group had lower AVA but similar mean gradient. Yet the actuarial curves for progressing to HGAS were significantly different: 25% of patients in LGAS reached HGAS status significantly earlier than did 25% of patients in the moderate-AS group (713 vs 881 d; P=0.035). Because LGAS has a high propensity to progress to HGAS, we propose that low-gradient aortic stenosis patients be closely monitored as a distinct subgroup that warrants more frequent echocardiographic follow-up.
由于低梯度主动脉瓣狭窄(LGAS)的自然病程尚未明确界定,我们对116例连续的主动脉瓣狭窄患者进行了一项回顾性研究,这些患者接受了随访超声心动图检查,中位随访间隔为698天(范围371 - 1020天)。所有患者在随访期间及之后左心室射血分数均保持正常(>0.50)。基线时,根据主动脉瓣面积(AVA)将患者分为轻度狭窄(≥1.5 cm²)、中度狭窄(≥1至<1.5 cm²)或重度狭窄(<1 cm²)。重度主动脉瓣狭窄再根据平均压差进一步分类(LGAS,平均压差<40 mmHg;高梯度主动脉瓣狭窄[HGAS],平均压差≥40 mmHg)。我们比较了轻度狭窄、中度狭窄、LGAS和HGAS这4组患者的基线值和随访值。基线时,30例患者为轻度狭窄,54例为中度狭窄,24例为LGAS,8例为HGAS。与中度狭窄组相比,LGAS组的AVA较低,但平均压差相似。然而,进展为HGAS的精算曲线显著不同:LGAS组中25%的患者达到HGAS状态的时间明显早于中度主动脉瓣狭窄组中25%的患者(713天对881天;P = 0.035)。由于LGAS有很高的进展为HGAS的倾向,我们建议将低梯度主动脉瓣狭窄患者作为一个独特的亚组进行密切监测,该亚组需要更频繁的超声心动图随访。