Keswani Kiran, Maria Rahul, Punga Rohit
Reader, Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Vyas Dental College and Hospital , Jodhpur, Rajasthan, India .
Head of the Department, Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, RishiRaj College of Dental Sciences , Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh, India .
J Clin Diagn Res. 2014 Apr;8(4):ZC04-6. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2014/7241.4220. Epub 2014 Apr 15.
This in vitro study evaluated: a) the retention of stainless steel posts of 1.5 mm diameter which were cemented with Zinc Phosphate cement versus Glass fiber posts with 1.1 mm, 1.3 mm and 1.5 mm diameters which were cemented with resin cement and b) the effect of change in diameter on the retention of Glass fiber posts with 1.1 mm, 1.3 mm and 1.5 mm diameters.
Sixty extracted mandibular premolar teeth were endodontically treated and randomly assigned to four groups of fifteen teeth each. In Groups I, II and III glass fibre posts with diameters 1.1 mm, 1.3 mm and 1.5 mm were cemented by using resin cement. In Group IV, stainless steel posts with diameter 1.5 mm were cemented by using zinc phosphate cement. The specimens were tested for tensile loading at a cross head speed of 2.0 mm/min, on a universal testing machine.
One way analysis of variance and Tukey's (post-hoc) test.
Mean tensile strength from highest to lowest was in the order of Group IV, Group II, Group III, Group I. Statistically significant differences were observed between the mean tensile strengths between Groups I and II, Groups I and III, Groups I and IV, Groups II and IV, Groups III and IV, while non significant differences were observed between Groups II and III.
Stainless steel posts were more retentive than glass fibre posts. Glass fibre posts with 1.3 mm or 1.5 mm diameters provided significantly greater retention as compared to 1.1 mm diameter posts.
本体外研究评估了:a)用磷酸锌水门汀粘结的直径1.5mm不锈钢桩与用树脂水门汀粘结的直径1.1mm、1.3mm和1.5mm玻璃纤维桩的固位情况;b)直径变化对直径1.1mm、1.3mm和1.5mm玻璃纤维桩固位的影响。
60颗拔除的下颌前磨牙经根管治疗后随机分为四组,每组15颗牙。第一组、第二组和第三组分别用树脂水门汀粘结直径1.1mm、1.3mm和1.5mm的玻璃纤维桩。第四组用磷酸锌水门汀粘结直径1.5mm的不锈钢桩。在万能试验机上以2.0mm/min的十字头速度对标本进行拉伸加载测试。
单因素方差分析和Tukey事后检验。
平均拉伸强度从高到低依次为第四组、第二组、第三组、第一组。第一组与第二组、第一组与第三组、第一组与第四组、第二组与第四组、第三组与第四组之间的平均拉伸强度存在统计学显著差异,而第二组与第三组之间无显著差异。
不锈钢桩的固位力比玻璃纤维桩更强。与直径1.1mm的玻璃纤维桩相比,直径1.3mm或1.5mm的玻璃纤维桩固位力显著更强。