Suppr超能文献

解剖学双束前交叉韧带重建的体内运动学评估

In vivo kinematic evaluation of anatomic double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

作者信息

Kopf Sebastian, Musahl Volker, Bignozzi Simone, Irrgang James J, Zaffagnini Stefano, Fu Freddie H

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA Center for Musculoskeletal Surgery, Charité-University Medicine Berlin, Berlin, Germany.

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.

出版信息

Am J Sports Med. 2014 Sep;42(9):2172-7. doi: 10.1177/0363546514538958. Epub 2014 Jun 24.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

There is controversy regarding the functional role of the posterolateral (PL) bundle of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL).

PURPOSE

To evaluate the in vivo function of the PL and anteromedial (AM) bundles of the ACL during anatomic double-bundle (DB) ACL reconstruction for acute, isolated ACL tears utilizing a computer navigation system to track intraoperative knee kinematics.

STUDY DESIGN

Controlled laboratory study.

METHODS

Fifteen patients with acute, isolated ACL tears who underwent anatomic DB ACL reconstruction formed the sample for this study. During surgery, knees were examined by a clinician preoperatively, after fixation of the PL bundle, and after fixation of both the PL and AM bundles. An image-free computer navigation system with custom-made software recorded the data during kinematic tests. The examination consisted of the Lachman and anterior drawer tests, internal-external rotation at 30° of knee flexion, and varus-valgus rotation at 30° of knee flexion. Paired Wilcoxon tests were performed to evaluate the effects of each bundle. The comparisons included ACL-deficient to PL bundle-reconstructed knees, ACL-deficient to DB ACL-reconstructed knees, and PL bundle-reconstructed to DB ACL-reconstructed knees. Significance was set at P < .017 to account for the multiple comparisons.

RESULTS

Fixation of the PL bundle significantly improved knee laxity during the Lachman and anterior drawer tests as well as internal-external rotation at 30° of knee flexion (P < .017 for all tests). The addition of the AM bundle further improved knee laxity during the Lachman and anterior drawer tests compared with PL bundle fixation as well as during varus-valgus rotation at 30° of knee flexion compared with ACL-deficient knees (P < .017 for all tests).

CONCLUSION

This in vivo study demonstrates that isolated PL bundle reconstruction improves laxity in an ACL-deficient knee and that the addition of the AM bundle improves laxity parameters further.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Abnormal knee kinematics is known to be linked to the earlier onset of osteoarthritis and lower rates of return to sport. This study suggests that both the AM and PL bundles are important to stabilize ACL-deficient knees.

摘要

背景

关于前交叉韧带(ACL)后外侧(PL)束的功能作用存在争议。

目的

利用计算机导航系统跟踪术中膝关节运动学,评估急性、单纯ACL撕裂患者在解剖双束(DB)ACL重建术中PL束和前内侧(AM)束的体内功能。

研究设计

对照实验室研究。

方法

15例急性、单纯ACL撕裂且接受解剖DB ACL重建的患者构成了本研究的样本。手术过程中,临床医生在术前、PL束固定后以及PL束和AM束都固定后对膝关节进行检查。一个带有定制软件的无图像计算机导航系统在运动学测试期间记录数据。检查包括Lachman试验和前抽屉试验、膝关节屈曲30°时的内外旋转以及膝关节屈曲30°时的内翻-外翻旋转。进行配对Wilcoxon检验以评估每一束的效果。比较包括ACL缺损膝关节与PL束重建膝关节、ACL缺损膝关节与DB ACL重建膝关节以及PL束重建膝关节与DB ACL重建膝关节。为考虑多重比较,显著性设定为P < .017。

结果

PL束固定显著改善了Lachman试验和前抽屉试验以及膝关节屈曲30°时的内外旋转时的膝关节松弛度(所有测试P < .017)。与PL束固定相比,AM束的添加在Lachman试验和前抽屉试验中进一步改善了膝关节松弛度,与ACL缺损膝关节相比,在膝关节屈曲30°时的内翻-外翻旋转中也进一步改善了膝关节松弛度(所有测试P < .017)。

结论

这项体内研究表明,单纯PL束重建可改善ACL缺损膝关节的松弛度,而AM束的添加可进一步改善松弛度参数。

临床意义

已知膝关节运动学异常与骨关节炎的早期发病和较低的运动恢复率有关。本研究表明,AM束和PL束对稳定ACL缺损膝关节都很重要。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验