Iqbal M Bilal, Arujuna Aruna, Ilsley Charles, Archbold Andrew, Crake Tom, Firoozi Sam, Kalra Sundeep, Knight Charles, Lim Pitt, Malik Iqbal S, Mathur Anthony, Meier Pascal, Rakhit Roby D, Redwood Simon, Whitbread Mark, Bromage Dan, Rathod Krishna, Wragg Andrew, MacCarthy Philip, Dalby Miles
From the Royal Brompton and Harefield NHS Foundation Trust, Harefield Hospital, Middlesex, United Kingdom (M.B.I., A. Arujuna, C.I., M.D.); UCL Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Heart Hospital, London, United Kingdom (T.C., P. Meier); Kings College Hospital, King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom (S.K., P. MacCarthy); Barts Health NHS Trust, The London Chest Hospital, London, United Kingdom (A. Archbold, C.K., A.M., D.B., K.R., A.W.); St. George's Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust, St. George's Hospital, London, United Kingdom (S.F., P.L.); Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, Hammersmith Hospital, London, United Kingdom (I.S.M.); Royal Free London NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom (R.D.R.); BHF Centre of Excellence, Kings College London, St. Thomas' Hospital, London, United Kingdom (S.R.); and London Ambulance Service, London, United Kingdom (M.W.).
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2014 Aug;7(4):456-64. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.114.001314. Epub 2014 Jun 24.
Compared with transfemoral access, transradial access (TRA) for percutaneous coronary intervention is associated with reduced risk of bleeding and vascular complications. Studies suggest that TRA may reduce mortality in patients with ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction. However, there are few data on the effect of TRA on mortality, specifically, in patients with non-ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction.
We analyzed 10 095 consecutive patients with non-ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction treated with percutaneous coronary intervention between 2005 and 2011 in all 8 tertiary cardiac centers in London, United Kingdom. TRA was a predictor for reduced bleeding (odds ratio=0.21; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.08-0.57; P=0.002), access-site complications (odds ratio=0.47; 95% CI: 0.23-0.95; P=0.034), and 1-year mortality (hazard ratio [HR]=0.72; 95% CI: 0.54-0.94; P=0.017). Between 2005 and 2007, TRA did not appear to reduce mortality at 1 year (HR=0.81; 95% CI: 0.51-1.28; P=0.376), whereas between 2008 and 2011, TRA conferred survival benefit at 1 year (HR=0.65; 95% CI: 0.46-0.92; P=0.015). The mortality benefit with TRA at 1 year was not seen at the low-volume centers (HR=0.80; 95% CI: 0.47-1.38; P=0.428) but specifically seen in the high volume radial centers (HR=0.70; 95% CI: 0.51-0.97; P=0.031). In propensity-matched analyses, TRA remained a predictor for survival at 1 year (HR=0.60; 95% CI: 0.42-0.85; P=0.005). Instrumental variable analysis demonstrated that TRA conferred mortality benefit at 1-year with an absolute mortality reduction of 5.8% (P=0.039).
In this analysis of patients with non-ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction, TRA appears to be a predictor for survival. Furthermore, the evolving learning curve, experience, and expertise may be important factors contributing to the prognostic benefit conferred with TRA.
与经股动脉途径相比,经桡动脉途径(TRA)用于经皮冠状动脉介入治疗时,出血和血管并发症风险较低。研究表明,TRA可能降低ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者的死亡率。然而,关于TRA对死亡率的影响,特别是在非ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者中的数据较少。
我们分析了2005年至2011年间在英国伦敦所有8家三级心脏中心接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的10095例连续非ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者。TRA是出血减少(优势比=0.21;95%置信区间[CI]:0.08 - 0.57;P = 0.002)、穿刺部位并发症减少(优势比=0.47;95% CI:0.23 - 0.95;P = 0.034)和1年死亡率降低(风险比[HR]=0.72;95% CI:0.54 - 0.94;P = 0.017)的预测因素。在2005年至2007年间,TRA似乎并未降低1年死亡率(HR=0.81;95% CI:0.51 - 1.28;P = 0.376),而在2008年至2011年间,TRA在1年时具有生存获益(HR=0.65;95% CI:0.46 - 0.92;P = 0.015)。在低手术量中心未观察到TRA在1年时的死亡率获益(HR=0.80;95% CI:0.47 - 1.38;P = 0.428),但在高手术量桡动脉中心特别明显(HR=0.70;95% CI:0.51 - 0.97;P = 0.031)。在倾向评分匹配分析中,TRA仍然是1年生存的预测因素(HR=0.60;95% CI:0.42 - 0.85;P = 0.005)。工具变量分析表明,TRA在1年时具有死亡率获益,绝对死亡率降低5.8%(P = 0.039)。
在这项对非ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者的分析中,TRA似乎是生存的预测因素。此外,不断演变的学习曲线、经验和专业知识可能是TRA带来预后获益的重要因素。