Avey Marc T, Bloomfield Laurie L, Elie Julie E, Freeberg Todd M, Guillette Lauren M, Hoeschele Marisa, Lee Homan, Moscicki Michele K, Owens Jessica L, Sturdy Christopher B
Department of Psychology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Department of Psychology, Algoma University, Sault Ste. Marie, Ontario, Canada.
PLoS One. 2014 Jun 25;9(6):e100927. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0100927. eCollection 2014.
Neuronal populations in the songbird nidopallium increase in activity the most to conspecific vocalizations relative to heterospecific songbird vocalizations or artificial stimuli such as tones. Here, we tested whether the difference in neural activity between conspecific and heterospecific vocalizations is due to acoustic differences or to the degree of phylogenetic relatedness of the species producing the vocalizations. To compare differences in neural responses of black-capped chickadees, Poecile atricapillus, to playback conditions we used a known marker for neural activity, ZENK, in the caudal medial nidopallium and caudomedial mesopallium. We used the acoustically complex 'dee' notes from chick-a-dee calls, and vocalizations from other heterospecific species similar in duration and spectral features. We tested the vocalizations from three heterospecific species (chestnut-backed chickadees, tufted titmice, and zebra finches), the vocalizations from conspecific individuals (black-capped chickadees), and reversed versions of the latter. There were no significant differences in the amount of expression between any of the groups except in the control condition, which resulted in significantly less neuronal activation. Our results suggest that, in certain cases, neuronal activity is not higher in response to conspecific than in response to heterospecific vocalizations for songbirds, but rather is sensitive to the acoustic features of the signal. Both acoustic features of the calls and the phylogenetic relationship between of the signaler and the receiver interact in the response of the nidopallium.
相对于异种鸣禽的叫声或诸如音调之类的人工刺激,鸣禽巢皮质中的神经元群体对同种叫声的反应最为活跃。在这里,我们测试了同种和异种叫声之间神经活动的差异是由于声学差异还是由于发出叫声的物种的系统发育相关性程度。为了比较黑顶山雀(Poecile atricapillus)对回放条件的神经反应差异,我们在尾内侧巢皮质和尾内侧中脑皮质中使用了一种已知的神经活动标记物ZENK。我们使用了来自 chick-a-dee 叫声中声学复杂的“dee”音符,以及其他在持续时间和频谱特征上相似的异种物种的叫声。我们测试了三种异种物种(栗背山雀、簇羽山雀和斑胸草雀)的叫声、同种个体(黑顶山雀)的叫声以及后者的反向版本。除了在对照条件下神经元激活明显较少外,任何组之间的表达量均无显著差异。我们的结果表明,在某些情况下,鸣禽对同种叫声的神经活动并不高于对异种叫声的神经活动,而是对信号的声学特征敏感。叫声的声学特征以及信号发出者和接收者之间的系统发育关系在巢皮质的反应中相互作用。