Chen Qing, Boulanger Alice, Hinton Deborah M, Stibitz Scott
Division of Bacterial, Parasitic, and Allergenic Products, Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research, FDA, Bethesda, MD, 20892, USA.
Mol Microbiol. 2014 Aug;93(4):748-58. doi: 10.1111/mmi.12690. Epub 2014 Jul 13.
The Bvg-regulated promoters for the fimbrial subunit genes fim2 and fim3 of Bordetella pertussis behave differently from each other both in vivo and in vitro. In vivo Pfim2 is significantly stronger than Pfim3 , even though predictions based on the DNA sequences of BvgA-binding motifs and core promoter elements would indicate the opposite. In vitro Pfim3 demonstrated robust BvgA∼P-dependent transcriptional activation, while none was seen with Pfim2 . This apparent contradiction was investigated further. By swapping sequence elements we created a number of hybrid promoters and assayed their strength in vivo. We found that, while Pfim3 promoter elements upstream of the +1 transcriptional start site do indeed direct Bvg-activated transcription more efficiently than those of Pfim2 , the overall promoter strength of Pfim3 in vivo is reduced due to sequences downstream of +1 that inhibit transcription more than 250-fold. This element, the DRE (downstream repressive element), was mapped to the 15 bp immediately downstream of the Pfim3 +1. Placing the DRE in different promoter contexts indicated that its activity was not specific to fim promoters, or even to Bvg-regulated promoters. However it does appear to be specific to Bordetella species in that it did not function in Escherichia coli.
百日咳博德特氏菌菌毛亚基基因fim2和fim3的Bvg调控启动子在体内和体外表现各异。在体内,Pfim2比Pfim3显著更强,尽管基于BvgA结合基序和核心启动子元件的DNA序列预测结果却相反。在体外,Pfim3表现出强大的BvgA∼P依赖性转录激活,而Pfim2则未观察到这种激活。我们进一步研究了这一明显的矛盾。通过交换序列元件,我们构建了多个杂交启动子,并在体内检测它们的强度。我们发现,虽然转录起始位点+1上游的Pfim3启动子元件确实比Pfim2的那些元件更有效地指导Bvg激活的转录,但由于+1下游的序列抑制转录超过250倍,Pfim3在体内的整体启动子强度降低。这个元件,即下游抑制元件(DRE),被定位到Pfim3 +1下游紧邻的15 bp处。将DRE置于不同的启动子环境中表明,其活性并非fim启动子所特有,甚至也不是Bvg调控启动子所特有。然而,它似乎确实是博德特氏菌属特有的,因为它在大肠杆菌中不起作用。